nas8e9 wrote:I'm with j_c_hallgren on this one: I do find it handy to have two specific shortcuts to help information as well as the general entry point. In terms of it being unusual, I do see it elsewhere. Finally, the Help menu has 9 items in total; compared to the Edit menu, I find it quite manageable.
...but do those shortcuts need to be there (especially since they are accessible with just one click or KS)? Why are they separate by a line from 'Context and Index' if they point to the same manual?
nas8e9 wrote:Some menu duplication (Move/Copy/Backup and Trial version info/Unlock) may seem redundant but can aid inexperienced users hunting a particular function. I can see why this duplication can be useful for such users.
Or is it to cater for different preconceptions regarding where particular menu choices should be? XYplorer should have one clear place where such functionality is placed, because menus already have plenty of entries. Consolidation would do no harm.
nas8e9 wrote:The consistency issues with trailing dots, duplicate letters for selecting settings and greying out of menu items are probably worthy of separate bug reports.
Perhaps, though all of those are UI issues, so I included them under the roof of this thread. I don't think of them as bugs, but more as "unwanted behaviour".
nas8e9 wrote:Regarding List Management, I can see your point but do find the present menu structure aids discoverability.
Discoverability of what exactly? I'm not suggesting that those options should be hidden. I am, however, suggesting that they should be consolidated into one, easy-to-manage menu choice. This is particular emphasised by the fact that clicking on each one brings up the same window, so there's a common theme across this range. If more List Management options are added then menu won't grow, just the drop-down list. More should go on behind the scenes, instead of users' eyes.
nas8e9 wrote:In general, I don't recognize your impression that XYplorer's UI is an impediment. Some of your suggestions I can agree with, but not your overall impression.
Finally, when looking at the road map I see several items which to me, seem to have far greater priority: XYcopy and Win7 stuff for starters. I'm not sure UI overhaul x.0 should be a priority.
I don't think that XY's UI is an impediment, it's good, but it's not great. That being said, most of the deficiencies that I highlighted are cosmetic, they won't radically overhaul the whole GUI, but they will improve it.
While yes, I do agree that XYcopy and Win 7 are greater priorities, I also think that those cosmetic improvements can be done little and often as extras to each point release. This would allow big, headline-type features to shine in the changelog as XY's GUI would make good strides toward being truly great
