XYplorer Beta Club

Seems to be reverted back in x32 27.20.301 (perhaps before, sometime during the last 2-3 weeks). In x64 28.00.0558 seems to be OK (i.e. as introduced in December 2024 in x32). Maybe a side effect of the work on forms regarding a multi monitor settings? Thanks and best regards, Borut EDIT: Sorry, in...

Just another example - here is how it looks at my place:

Please give additional info about Win, monitor(s), DPI, scaling... See here for a permanent info in your profile's Location field, which might give this issue some priority boost: viewtopic.php?p=231018&hilit=pledge#p231018

Confirmed SOLVED in 27.90.0011. :tup: Re. TB: Yep, I was affraid that that would be your experience, but do expect that it will end good. You are from another film and there are for sure not many that can follow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cUKUCtQSj0 ;) Have a nice weekend (if you know what is...

[...]Not sure it should be in that thread as there's no error message, just a sudden crash. @sl23: I think that currently it is still OK to report x64-issues either here, or in separate threads. However, Don has recently suggested that separate threads with a clear indication in subject that it is ...

This is not new and existed also in previous x64 versions. Only cosmetics, more or less, so low prio... On my quite small laptop monitor and 125% scaling: Monitor: 1/2 (Primary) Screen: 1920x1080 Virtual: (0, 0) - (3840, 1080) Work: (0, 0) - (1920, 979) Screen DPI: 120 (125%) twX: 12 Stretch: 1,25 s...

admin wrote: ↑14 Jul 2025 09:52[...] Anyway, I changed the implicit date-to-string conversion to an explicit one and things look good now.

Confirmed as SOLVED in 27.90.0007

It seems that I can confirm the TB system date issue which jupe has found:

If you are just trying to remove a active LF, I think I'd recommend this way instead filter , 8; Hey jupe, the very diplomatic light bringer :ugeek: :), many thanks! :tup: Yup, that was the intention and your suggestion does the same, but I find it much more appropriate, not being some "cunnin...

A simple script like: focus "LFB"; sendkeys "{Esc}"; with the latest TB beta and a filled LFB doesn't lead to anything but the expected result: a cleared LFB... Thanks for checking highend! Yes, I agree: In my case the issue is sometimes not happening, but mostly it does. I coul...

SC: In one of my scripts I have apparently been using (for what it is worth) the undocumented command sendkeys , like this: sendkeys "{Esc}"; // clear type ahead When used from the address line, alone, apparently nothing happens. When used in the original script (immediately after a focus;...

Marc wrote: ↑08 Jul 2025 16:55PS. I think it would be a good idea to add x64 after the version number in the title bar as long as the VB x86 version still exists (for those who use both versions as long as the x64 version is not finished).

Can confirm that manually updated version 27.00.0907 (64-bit) is correctly SC-searching for the update (i.e. ATM confirming that it is the last beta version). BTW, regarding that small cosmetic issue with the Copyright line position on the About XYplorer form - please see the attached screenshot. Th...

I meanwhile have a similar setting as klownboy. Additional Q: From my viewpoint it would be nice if a 32b version would be SC-updating the 32b version (=VB?) and the 64b version the TB version. Will that be the case?