alternative idea for the Status Bar

[Schnuckelchen]

I send you this idea, because:
1) Your new feature "sizeable status bar" is too less for me.
2) The hard-coded content of the status bar is false for me.
3) The sharing in 3 sections is false for me.

You have hard-coded the following, in 3 sections:
33 elements (609.42 GB free) | total: 19.75 GB (21.203.044.663 Bytes) 26 files... | [anything third]

My idea is an editable soft-code, in 1 section:
<TE> elements (<FO2> GB free) , total: <TO2> GB (<TB> Bytes) <TE> files... , [anything third]

=================================
Here are the codes:
<SB> = selected Bytes = example: 1,022,999,111 Bytes
<SK> = selected KiloBytes = example: 1,003,245 KB
<SM> = selected MegaBytes = example: 2,234 MB
<SG> = selected GigaBytes = example: 2 GB
<SO> = selected optimized (when GB greater 0 then GB, else MB, else KB, else Bytes)
<SF> = count of selected files = example: 5 selected
<SD> = count of selected directories = example: 5 selected
<SE> = count of selected elements (= F+D) = example: 5 selected
<SI> = icon of selected file

<T...> total, like selected

<F...> free, like selected

specials for the drive:
<DS> = selected optimzed = example: 6 GB
<DF> = free optimzed
<DT> = total optimzed
<DU> = used optimzed
<DC> = drive character = example: E
<DN> = drive name = example: MySamsung99TBSSD

With a count it is expandable to:
<SG1> = selected GigaBytes with 1 count after the point = example: 2.2
<SG2> = selected GigaBytes with 2 counts after the point = example: 2.17
====================================

By the way: The status bar looses the widths after some actions.

(END)

[admin]

Or leave it as it is. Thank you for your ideas. They are in the world now, and who knows how they will fare.

By the way: The status bar looses the widths after some actions.

It does? Not here.