OT: World-Wide Alzheimer

Please check the FAQ (https://www.xyplorer.com/faq.php) before posting a question...
Post Reply
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66375
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

OT: World-Wide Alzheimer

Post by admin »

A prehistoric promotion blurb about XYplorer which I removed from all original sources on 2006-05-25 is still popping up in countless online places on every new release, also today: "XYplorer is an Advanced File System Explorer targeting everybody who..." Google finds almost 1 million pages replicating this stone age piece of information. How long will it survive? We need a digital Darwin, a new evolution theory of information history. Which info bits survive and replicate, which will perish? Which will evolve (mutations / copy errors) to stronger, fitter texts, better adapt to ever changing semantic / technological environments? Etc. And I personally would like to learn: How can I extinguish a particular species of information? How to break into a recursive copy cycle and change the DNA? How to be the informational gamma ray that alters the sequence?

PeterH
Posts: 2829
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 20:39
Location: DE W11Pro 24H2, 1920*1200*100% 3840*2160*150%

Re: OT: World-Wide Alzheimer

Post by PeterH »

I'm afraid if you knew how to, you could earn much more money than with XY :P

kunkel321
Posts: 664
Joined: 10 Jun 2012 03:45
Location: Near Seattle

Re: OT: World-Wide Alzheimer

Post by kunkel321 »

I suppose in this case, "fitness" is actually "clickiness."

And instead of "random mutations" of the digital code, it's likely to be intentional alterations of meta-data driving the propagation. Automated data bots that have been running unchecked for too long.
ste(phen|ve) kunkel
Scaling: Main monitor 125%, Secondary monitor on the right 100%
OS: Win 10. XYplorer version: Latest beta, unless specified.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 66375
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

Re: OT: World-Wide Alzheimer

Post by admin »

kunkel321 wrote:I suppose in this case, "fitness" is actually "clickiness."

And instead of "random mutations" of the digital code, it's likely to be intentional alterations of meta-data driving the propagation. Automated data bots that have been running unchecked for too long.
It's likely that ever-growing parts of the web content will be stale information generated by bots through copying and resampling. Informational replicants, in Blade Runner terminology. (Blade Runner is becoming a historical movie...)

Whatever, when you visit a software page to download a piece of software that was published today, there is no way to tell if the information text is actual and not many years old and completely outdated. The web is a mountain of sediments and using it needs the mindframe of an archeologist. The Indiana Jones approach to surfing... :)

Post Reply