Page 1 of 1
Features requested
Posted: 10 Apr 2012 02:22
by PortableCreator
1. Archiver - It is best if xyplorer has its very own archiver, for rar, zip, and 7z.
2. Incremental name replacement
Example:
1 - file 1.txt
2 - file 36.txt
To:
16 - file 1.txt
17 - file 36.txt
Re: Features requested
Posted: 10 Apr 2012 02:30
by nas8e9
PortableCreator wrote:1. Archiver - It is best if xyplorer has its very own archiver, for rar, zip, and 7z.
Hi and welcome,
Native support for ZIP and RAR in included on XYplorer's
roadmap, but not support for other archive formats at the moment.
PortableCreator wrote:2. Incremental name replacement
Example:
1 - file 1.txt
2 - file 36.txt
To:
16 - file 1.txt
17 - file 36.txt
I'm afraid your example isn't clear to me. Could you expand on that?
Regardless, you may want to look at the Batch Rename dialog which is shown when you select more than one file, in which the built-in help text talks about a syntax for increments.
Re: Features requested
Posted: 10 Apr 2012 02:41
by PortableCreator
that is fast, anyway
That is still going to come
In the incremental replace
For example, replacing the specific number with a new one, just like that
Re: Features requested
Posted: 10 Apr 2012 03:48
by nas8e9
PortableCreator wrote:In the incremental replace
For example, replacing the specific number with a new one, just like that
I'd take a look at the options in File > Rename Special; it offers Search and Replace, among (many) other options.
Re: Features requested
Posted: 10 Apr 2012 09:07
by Stefan
PortableCreator wrote:2. Incremental name replacement
Example:
1 - file 1.txt
2 - file 36.txt
To:
16 - file 1.txt
17 - file 36.txt
For example, replacing the specific number with a new one, just like that
Without using an script, this needs two steps as far as i see.
E.g.:
1.)
Batch Rename - add counter, start at '16'
<#16> - *
From:
1 - file 1.txt
2 - file 36.txt
To:
16 - 1 - file 1.txt
17 - 2 - file 36.txt
2.)
RegEx Rename - remove old numbers
(- \d+ ) >
From:
16 - 1 - file 1.txt
17 - 2 - file 36.txt
To:
16 - file 1.txt
17 - file 36.txt
Re: Features requested
Posted: 17 Apr 2012 08:00
by PortableCreator
well, not the way exactly as said
Like replacing the numbers 1 and 2 with 16 and 17, while not affecting the other numbers in the file..., and also clearing part of the name with the specific format, like with (ddd) for editing the part of the name with 3 numbers together like 357, 358...
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 15:00
by PortableCreator
How about, for the easiest and the most user-friendly, all renames, even special rename, are all added in the rename function, just showing all the specific templates for special renaming
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 19:38
by kpc007
Hi, was wondering when the true 64bit version will be ready? Any idea of a approx date of release? My 64bit anti-virus program will not run in the 32bit version I now have (v10.80). I have the lifetime registration and will update when the 64bit one comes out. Thanks......(BTW, love this program!

)
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 19:43
by admin
Welcome!
kpc007 wrote:My 64bit anti-virus program will not run in the 32bit version I now have (v10.80).
Not run? You mean it does not appear in the shell context menu of files. Read this, please:
http://www.xyplorer.com/faq-topic.php?id=ctx64
Don
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 19:57
by kpc007
admin wrote:Welcome!
kpc007 wrote:My 64bit anti-virus program will not run in the 32bit version I now have (v10.80).
Not run? You mean it does not appear in the shell context menu of files. Read this, please:
http://www.xyplorer.com/faq-topic.php?id=ctx64
Don
My anti-virus program provided by my internet service is specific to 64bit platforms. In order to run the 32bit version I must load the 32bit OS. Kinda stuck on 64bit OS now. For a workaround I use the windows explorer which has my anti-virus in it's shell. I test scan all files I d/l from the internet prior to opening them. I check them in the windows explorer first then open in Xyplorer. Kinda inconvienent but it's all I have at this time. Better safe than sorry.

Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 20:36
by neutrox
I can't say for sure but your AV scanner my be launched using Portable Open With XY feature on currently selected files?
NOT for 64 bit issues I'm doing that way with WinRAR and Sandboxie so far so good. A more experienced user may provide a script, then?
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 20:38
by kpc007
neutrox wrote:I can't say for sure but your AV scanner my be launched using Portable Open With XY feature on currently selected files?
NOT for 64 bit issues I'm doing that way with WinRAR and Sandboxie so far so good. A more experienced user may provide a script, then?
Been there done that with no luck. Looks like it's 64bit or nothing. These anti-virus programs are very particular to outside actions.
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 20:58
by admin
kpc007 wrote:neutrox wrote:I can't say for sure but your AV scanner my be launched using Portable Open With XY feature on currently selected files?
NOT for 64 bit issues I'm doing that way with WinRAR and Sandboxie so far so good. A more experienced user may provide a script, then?
Been there done that with no luck. Looks like it's 64bit or nothing. These anti-virus programs are very particular to outside actions.
You mean you cannot even run the 64-bit EXE from XY (e.g. by dbl-clicking it)? Hard to believe.
Re: Features requested
Posted: 21 Apr 2012 21:19
by kpc007
admin wrote:kpc007 wrote:neutrox wrote:I can't say for sure but your AV scanner my be launched using Portable Open With XY feature on currently selected files?
NOT for 64 bit issues I'm doing that way with WinRAR and Sandboxie so far so good. A more experienced user may provide a script, then?
Been there done that with no luck. Looks like it's 64bit or nothing. These anti-virus programs are very particular to outside actions.
You mean you cannot even run the 64-bit EXE from XY (e.g. by dbl-clicking it)? Hard to believe.[/quote
Sure I can but it doesn't work with the scanner. When I do that it wants to execute the program, not scan it. That's all I want to do..SCAN!