Hi all,
am I missing a point? Why are there two commands dealing with the search templates?
It seems that searchtemplate() can do everything that loadsearch can do, but on top of it, it can also save a search template.
So, is there an important reason for this that I am missing?
Should we not use loadsearch or something?
loadsearch vs. searchtemplate()
loadsearch vs. searchtemplate()
[AHK] redirecting Windows Explorer to XY, [XYS] Mini Tree with open tabs (cur loc expanded, tab folders highlighted), [AHK] customInlineRenameKeys, [AHK] clipboardHelper_and_XYEscToList
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 64916
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
- Contact:
Re: loadsearch vs. searchtemplate()
Hmmm, good question
There is indeed a significant overlap. Nobody noticed it until you came along. Can't do anything about it (without breaking old code), so we have to live with it.
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY X
Re: loadsearch vs. searchtemplate()
Ok, thanks for letting me know.
Now I know that I am not overlooking anything.
Now I know that I am not overlooking anything.
[AHK] redirecting Windows Explorer to XY, [XYS] Mini Tree with open tabs (cur loc expanded, tab folders highlighted), [AHK] customInlineRenameKeys, [AHK] clipboardHelper_and_XYEscToList
XYplorer Beta Club