AFAICT, the fundamental difference is that caching is on a per-session basis and stacks is persistent through multiple sessions (until deleted).
Is it fair to say that caching is a necessary precursor to stacks?
I see drop stacks as being very similar in function to DOpus' "File Collections". Is this also a fair statement?
Can caching also be persistent? NB: I know you can add the contents of a search result tab to the Catalog, but I am concerned about seeing the cached results in the List.
Thanks,
-Jeff
Differences - Search Results Caching and Drop Stacks
-
Jeff Bellune
- Posts: 284
- Joined: 13 Dec 2007 12:55
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 65185
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
- Contact:
Re: Differences - Search Results Caching and Drop Stacks
Yes. Search Results Caching and Drop Stacks will both be persistent, and technically largely indentical.
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY X
XYplorer Beta Club