XYplorer Beta Club
I noticed that there are some issues with the current modern menu/toolbar, in fresh I can repro by just pressing the Show Menu button twice which causes the addressbar to be shown twice, once behind the buttons, eg:
Although it can be resolved by mouseover or switching sets, I think I've seen the issue return under certain circumstances.
x64: Toolbar display
Forum rules
READ THIS AND DO IT!!!
Please include the following information:
1) Your XYplorer Version (e.g., v28.00.0801)
2) Your Windows Version (e.g., Win 11)
3) Your Screen Scaling Percentage (e.g., 125%).
We strongly recommend adding your Windows Version and Screen Scaling Percentage to the Location field in your Profile or to your Signature. That way, you only have to type them once, and we won't have to search for that vital information.
When attaching an Image, please use the Attachment tab at the bottom of your post and click "Add files".
READ THIS AND DO IT!!!
READ THIS AND DO IT!!! Please include the following information:1) Your XYplorer Version (e.g., v28.00.0801)
2) Your Windows Version (e.g., Win 11)
3) Your Screen Scaling Percentage (e.g., 125%).
We strongly recommend adding your Windows Version and Screen Scaling Percentage to the Location field in your Profile or to your Signature. That way, you only have to type them once, and we won't have to search for that vital information. When attaching an Image, please use the Attachment tab at the bottom of your post and click "Add files". READ THIS AND DO IT!!!
-
jupe
- Posts: 3543
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017 21:14
- Location: Win10 22H2 120dpi
x64: Toolbar display
To see the attached files, you need to log into the forum.
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 67059
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
- Contact:
-
jupe
- Posts: 3543
- Joined: 20 Oct 2017 21:14
- Location: Win10 22H2 120dpi
Re: x64: Toolbar display
I thought it was strange no one else had mentioned it yet, but didn't think it would be dpi related or I would have actively mentioned it.
Anyway it seems resolved in .0301+
Anyway it seems resolved in .0301+