https://www.slant.co/topics/2404/~file- ... or-windows
You might add your vote (press Recommend for XYplorer
Think about it: It's good for you, too, if XY gets more publicity.
And likewise have I.murdock01 wrote:I submitted my recommendation and added a couple of "pros".
Code: Select all
Longtime Xplorer2Pro user, and I finally moved away from it because it wasn't keeping up, and because I finally spent enough time with XYplorer to understand just how good it really is. It helps me get the things I want & need to do faster, more efficiently, and more reliably than the native File Explorer or Xplorer2. It works well and the developer has a long track record of great customer support & reliable updates. It all adds up to a product that's well worth the price.I think there's a natural lag between reputation and performance. There are a couple of outdated file managers that are still doing well simply because they are known. And, of course, I will suffer forever from the good old VB6-bashing which is so ridiculous to everybody who knows a little bit about programming, but how to kill a myth? It's a bit like racism. Fools talk, fools believe.glenpiper wrote:I'm a bit surprised that XYplorer is running second, but there's no accounting for taste, right?![]()
Really? Seriously, I'm working with XYplorer all day long for 10+ years and I never wait and wait and wait for the window to come back."Doesn't do internal multitasking so often you sit there waiting and waiting and waiting for the window to come back."
admin wrote:"Doesn't do internal multitasking so often you sit there waiting and waiting and waiting for the window to come back."
Make it six.admin wrote:5 users agree with this Con.