<selitems> + ?tags:
-
eil
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: 13 Jan 2011 19:44
Re: <selitems> + ?tags:
many many thanks Don! now everything works 
Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768|1900x1080
-
eil
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: 13 Jan 2011 19:44
Re: <selitems> + ?tags:
it seems i found "not working properly" again.
i select some files and folders, there are some labeled files and folders in 1st tier, and some in subs. both
don't find folders of 1st tier. only 1st tier files, and properly files and folders in subs.
i select some files and folders, there are some labeled files and folders in 1st tier, and some in subs. both
Code: Select all
goto("+?tags:*");
text quicksearch("tags:*", "<selitems ;>"); Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768|1900x1080
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66656
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
- Contact:
Re: <selitems> + ?tags:
Confirmed! Argh, tricky. That was my relaxed weekend...

FAQ | XY News RSS | XY X
-
admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 66656
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
- Contact:
Re: <selitems> + ?tags:
OK, I thought about it again, and well, it works as as advertised. Search In List (SIL) is an extension of Multi Location Search (MLOS). In MLOS, the folders passed as search locations are never contained in the results, but are recursed and their contents are checked. The same is true for SIL. The difference is that in a SIL also files are among the search "locations". They are checked directly, of course, and can appear in the search results.
OTOH, I admit that what you observed looks a bit like a bug. But should SIL be redefined? Should the behavior change. Probably not.
OTOH, I admit that what you observed looks a bit like a bug. But should SIL be redefined? Should the behavior change. Probably not.
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY X
-
eil
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: 13 Jan 2011 19:44
Re: <selitems> + ?tags:
that's pity, 'cause by my understanding everything that is parsed should be "checked", 'cause otherwise function seems to be "not trustful".
before i was using an algorithm that checked items one by one: if its a file> check, if it's a folder> check and get list of internal items, and so on. imaging how long that is!? but That was the only way to truly say if there are any items i marked and forgot or someone marked and i even didn't know.
before i was using an algorithm that checked items one by one: if its a file> check, if it's a folder> check and get list of internal items, and so on. imaging how long that is!? but That was the only way to truly say if there are any items i marked and forgot or someone marked and i even didn't know.
Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768|1900x1080
XYplorer Beta Club