XYplorer Beta Club

klownboy wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2020 19:33

+ 1 for this one. The more actions we can customize via CEA scripts the better.

+100

+1 i have same bug for long time, obviously updating, but it doesn't disappear. same as TS i couldn't notice the proper way to reproduce, that's why didn't report, thougth it happens from time to time. in y case it's simple locked tab, no home zone or anything, path locked on root of micro-sd card t...

@jupe hm.. i would never imagine a pattern like this, because while it works it looks illogical... *.?.mp3 /e = original base(ok) + original extension(probably ok) + new extension(ok) + drop original extension(what?! i "kept original", then added new, and now dropping.. some extension) :shock: :eh: ...

trying to add .mp3 ext to files with no ext but dots in name.

while batch renaming several items with no extensions(even no dots at the end) and trying to add them new extension, noticed that if there are dots present inside base name, the extension is put inside name and not in the end. first thought i'm wrong with pattern, but tried all imaginable *? combina...

i still hope one day XYcopy will be enhanced to skip all questionable situations for last and first do all the operations that can be done without asking for user decision.

admin wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2020 13:14

Shouldn't this be the factory default? I

yep!

useful enchantment. +1

doesn't PIH is all about image dupes and can't be used for say mp3 dupes? so ticking Content and Image is so to say "must be" and logical for PIH use.)

much waiting for that time.!

FYI, you can now search images by similarity to a given image. sounds as neat feature for huge photo archives. :biggrin: i wonder if it may allow in future to hash an image with lots of green(photo in forest), and with some # tolerance find not similar, but same "lots-of-green"-images?. it's just a...

Thanks! And did the results look good? Not too many false positives are false negatives? visual presentation is good, groups are easily determined, text info is well informative. didn't check all dupes, don't really want to sort them right now, but checked about 10-15 groups = no false at all. You ...

that's what i can show as feedback. ~79Gb scanned, quite fast, especially as it's done on rather old laptop.
default SHA-1, 9 tolerance just for test SHA-256, 9 tolerance. kinda surprised it found 2 extras.

Set it to a value larger than 0 to define the tolerated distance for two images to be counted as dupes. Already tolerance 1 will ignore scale, brightness, contrast, saturation, and hue. Higher tolerance will ignore JPEG artifacts and minor differences in detail. just a thought, but wouldn't it be b...

my guessing "practical" meant here "more customization" for "personalizing" locations.
and actually i'd give +1 for such ability, if it's not that hard to add. still XY it already quite colourful.