admin wrote:I think iycgtptyarvg (cute name!) is right that it is at least misleading. The total size is simply the sum of all items in the Size column; if folder sizes are calculated then individual file sizes may be counted 2 times, 3 times, or more, depending on the depth of their position.
The solution would be not to add folder sizes to the sum.
hmm... I don't know about misleading, it's what to expect. You're not in a folder when that happens, you're showing search results, which might also come from different locations, etc So of course the total size announced might not represent anything "real."
You say you want to not add folder sizes to the sum, but what if my search was to return only folders, and I want to know how many space they all consume? Wouldn't each folder have a size and yet a "total: 0 byte" be confusing as well ??
Also, if folder sizes aren't counted on total, yet they are on selected, isn't that all the more confusing?? And if you plan on excluding them from selection, you'll hear me scream!
I think it's a lot less confusing to say total is the total of all sizes listed, so most of the times it means something, and when that includes folders as well as folders within those folders, you got a total size that might not mean much; than to say total is files only, so it really never represents anything...
I don't think the way it is now is particularly confusing, you just have to realize you're listing SR, which might lead to the same folders showing up more than once. If you want the size of files only, just exclude (sub)folders from your search, or simply select all files!

(And it's even easier if you don't calculate folder sizes automatically

)