Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Please check the FAQ (https://www.xyplorer.com/faq.php) before posting a question...
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 64917
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by admin »

Everybody knows what a flat view is, but GPSoftware (Directory Opus) claim that they invented the term "Flat View" for it and yesterday they informed me that they insist that I cease using "Flat View" for the flat view feature. Since they have put an unregistered trademark (TM) on the term "Flat View" in 2004, their lawyers would probably beat up my lawyers. So I need a new term.

I want "Flat" to be the first part of it for various reasons, and my current favorite is "Flat Tree". Do you have something better? (Note that "Flat Branch" is a brewery that is probably also going to sue me if I use it... LOL).

Note that I'm not amused about this. Changing that name (source code, help, web site) will be a lot of work for me. Googling Flat View yields 380,000,000 results. IMO that's common usage. If anybody of you happens to be a lawyer who knows more about this than me (and even little would be more) let me know if I really have to do this.

Borut
Posts: 1465
Joined: 19 Oct 2010 19:29
Location: Win10 Pro 64b 22H2, @120DPI (125%)

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by Borut »

No lawyer here, sorry. Just two suggestions...

1) Naming suggestion: flatten, flattened http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/flatten

2) Maybe you should talk with brewery - remember the ABBA story? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABBA#Official_naming

Good luck!
Borut
Win 10 Pro 64bit

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 64917
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by admin »

:) Yes, Flattened View would work for me.

jjk
Posts: 202
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 20:11
Location: Paris

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by jjk »

Why not Branch view ?

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 64917
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by admin »

jjk wrote:Why not Branch view ?
The word "flat" is already present in user code (/:flat). This cannot be withdrawn. That's why "flat" must be part of the term.

PeterH
Posts: 2826
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 20:39
Location: DE W11Pro 24H2, 1920*1200*100% 3840*2160*150%

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by PeterH »

What bad :cry:

Flat Tree seems not to say what it is - it's the mix of tree *and files*.
If Flattened View would be no problem I'd vote for it.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 64917
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1, Win10, Win11, all @100%
Contact:

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by admin »

PeterH wrote:What bad :cry:

Flat Tree seems not to say what it is - it's the mix of tree *and files*.
If Flattened View would be no problem I'd vote for it.
Agreed. So Flattened View is number one for now.

Stefan
Posts: 1360
Joined: 18 Nov 2008 21:47
Location: Europe

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by Stefan »

Flat list
Flat listing
Flat grouping

tiago
Posts: 589
Joined: 14 Feb 2011 21:41

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by tiago »

admin wrote:Everybody knows what a flat view is, but GPSoftware (Directory Opus) claim that they invented the term "Flat View" for it and yesterday they informed me that they insist that I cease using "Flat View" for the flat view feature. Since they have put an unregistered trademark (TM) on the term "Flat View" in 2004, their lawyers would probably beat up my lawyers. So I need a new term.

I want "Flat" to be the first part of it for various reasons, and my current favorite is "Flat Tree". Do you have something better? (Note that "Flat Branch" is a brewery that is probably also going to sue me if I use it... LOL).

Note that I'm not amused about this. Changing that name (source code, help, web site) will be a lot of work for me. Googling Flat View yields 380,000,000 results. IMO that's common usage. If anybody of you happens to be a lawyer who knows more about this than me (and even little would be more) let me know if I really have to do this.
That's the kind of matter that only detracts against a company IMO.
Please ensure this forum topic will not be touched by them by any means so future searches will reveal how ridiculous a company can be and keep up the great work, Don!
I just feel sorry I lost contact with a good legal advisor on intellectual property... :roll:
Power-hungry user!!!

Borut
Posts: 1465
Joined: 19 Oct 2010 19:29
Location: Win10 Pro 64b 22H2, @120DPI (125%)

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by Borut »

Well, Stefan's "Flat list" sounds good to me. It is not so cumbersome to pronounce as "flattened", I think.
Win 10 Pro 64bit

Trasd
Posts: 147
Joined: 19 Oct 2011 15:45

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by Trasd »

OK, I started a rant about the common phrase "Flat View" and it's uses in photography, and how Mr. Manski tried unsuccessfully, many times, to trademark the phrase - but then I found: "Flat View™ is trademarked by GPSoftware 2003. Opus6™, Opus8™, Opus9™, Opus10™ are trademarked by GPSoftware 2000-2011." and decided my complaining would do no good, even though I could find no reference to it but their claim.

So, I wanted to add my 2 cents about a name. I am terrible with names, but I would really suggest you not use the term "flat" anywhere in the new name. If your term is distinct enough (and we all use it when referring to this type of folder display), whatever you name it will become its definition (I hope I phrased that so it makes sense). In other words, people will not use "Flat View" to describe the viewing of all subfolders on a single tree level, but "XYtree View" or "SubTree View" or "Raze View" or whatever you name it. I like Raze...


tiago wrote:That's the kind of matter that only detracts against a company IMO.
My thoughts exactly - regardless of their legal claim (FreeCommander has used the term forever), I will never consider buying Directory Opous now (and I still don't shop at Exxon - not since the Valdez "accident" - I have a long memory for these things).
Last edited by Trasd on 25 Nov 2011 13:53, edited 5 times in total.
Trasd

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." A.C.C.

"I'll tell you this, no eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn." J. M.

PeterH
Posts: 2826
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 20:39
Location: DE W11Pro 24H2, 1920*1200*100% 3840*2160*150%

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by PeterH »

I think *not* flat listing or grouping.

But "Flat List" doesn't sound bad to me, too...

Borut
Posts: 1465
Joined: 19 Oct 2010 19:29
Location: Win10 Pro 64b 22H2, @120DPI (125%)

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by Borut »

Off topic, but I couldn't resist...
Trasd wrote:(and I still don't shop at Exxon - not since the Valdez "accident").
Cool. 8) I am doing the same with my electric power (am in Austria) after Fukushima (zero % nuclear in my cables and zero % of my energy provider in the ownership of any nuclear based company).
Win 10 Pro 64bit

nas8e9
Posts: 2232
Joined: 21 Jun 2008 14:50

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by nas8e9 »

Borut wrote:Well, Stefan's "Flat list" sounds good to me. It is not so cumbersome to pronounce as "flattened", I think.
I agree that "flat" is punchier, but I like "flattened" more as it describes the process and end result better. Also, I'm guessing that dropping "flat" entirely is safer from a legal point of view.

TheQwerty
Posts: 4373
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 22:30

Re: Flat View must not be called "Flat View"

Post by TheQwerty »

Branch View
Tree View
Family Tree VIew
Flat Search
Structure View
Hierarchy View
Flat Hierarchy
Flat Hierarchy View

Remove Flat from the name entirely... :wink:
Full List of All Things View

Post Reply