Page 1 of 2

Some possible bugs in the new "List Management"

Posted: 20 Mar 2006 12:51
by Gandolf
admin wrote:Menu Tools: add submenu "List Management" where you can manage lists like History, Favorites, Address Bar, Name, Location, etc...
WOW!! I like it. It looks as if the editing is going to be excellent.

I haven't investigated in detail but editing the history there appear to be a couple of strange effects:

1. Two entries are checked in the list, I think it's the current entry and the entry that has been moved / edited, but not sure.

2. An entry is duplicated. I think it is if I move / edit the current entry it appears again at the top of the list.

Both would appear to related to the current entry being added or checked when the edit function is exited. We're going out for the rest day so I won't get a chance to check further until later.

Re: Some possible bugs in the new "List Management"

Posted: 20 Mar 2006 15:52
by admin
Gandolf wrote:I haven't investigated in detail but editing the history there appear to be a couple of strange effects...
Indeed, just fixed them -- thanks!

Posted: 20 Mar 2006 16:04
by j_c_hallgren
:D now that looks REALLY nice!!!
So now...let's see how it performs! :wink:

1) In History -> Is there still a limit of 32 max? Because I was able to add more than that...
2) At the risk of sounding like a very spoiled kid, I could see a potential new option -> ability to move/copy entry to another list...so a history item could be relocated to address bar list....or...maybe that's easy enough to do by other existing ways....just wanted to throw it out...

Posted: 20 Mar 2006 16:12
by j_c_hallgren
:D :D Good grief! I didn't even finish my prior post before you added the Sort and Clear functions that I had thought of asking about! Now THAT'S what happens when you have a GREAT developer behind the product! Love it!!!! :D :D

Posted: 20 Mar 2006 22:30
by admin
j_c_hallgren wrote:1) In History -> Is there still a limit of 32 max? Because I was able to add more than that...
Oh, right. Hmm, should I tolerate this or keep the limit? I think I should rather be strict here and make the maximum configurable elsewhere.
j_c_hallgren wrote:2) At the risk of sounding like a very spoiled kid, I could see a potential new option -> ability to move/copy entry to another list...so a history item could be relocated to address bar list....or...maybe that's easy enough to do by other existing ways....just wanted to throw it out...
You are really spoiled! Let's keep your potential new option potential :wink:

Posted: 21 Mar 2006 00:57
by j_c_hallgren
I'd personally prefer the ability to pick the limit nbr elsewhere...so that someone may only want 10 or 15 entries but others may want 40...I'd pick a reasonable max limit on what user max could be...either 32, or 40?

:roll: Well, I did say I was acting spoiled, right? :oops: Unlike some who may just ask in a more demanding manner...
At least you got my idea of where you might develop it further, so that's fine for now.... :)

Posted: 21 Mar 2006 17:43
by j_c_hallgren
Just grabbed the .0045 vers with Favorites in List Mgmt... :)
Any particular reason why Up/Down/Sort are grayed out for these? :?

Posted: 22 Mar 2006 08:49
by admin
j_c_hallgren wrote:Just grabbed the .0045 vers with Favorites in List Mgmt... :)
Any particular reason why Up/Down/Sort are grayed out for these? :?
Yes: they are sorted already in the moment of adding them. Of course, now I could remove that service. But where would a new favorite go then? To the end of the list? Or to the top of it?

Posted: 22 Mar 2006 09:12
by j_c_hallgren
I'd only had a couple of entries in Favorites so didn't realize that they were already in order...however, should I add a new entry to Fav's via L-M, at that point, they then get out of sort order it seems...so that's the situation that I'm addressing, ok?

Addendum: Leaving the original add method as is makes sense...just how to handle the new way of adding...??

Posted: 22 Mar 2006 09:37
by admin
j_c_hallgren wrote:I'd only had a couple of entries in Favorites so didn't realize that they were already in order...however, should I add a new entry to Fav's via L-M, at that point, they then get out of sort order it seems...so that's the situation that I'm addressing, ok?

Addendum: Leaving the original add method as is makes sense...just how to handle the new way of adding...??
Try it: it will be auto-ordered after you press OK.

Posted: 22 Mar 2006 10:02
by j_c_hallgren
Ok... :oops: guess the test I did used "bad" data, so that would explain it..
I did an add in L-M but let the default "New" value be used...and that one did not get resorted...but a legit drive spec does get resorted...didn't try that before I posted...at least I used an existing forum thread!

Still I do wonder...would anyone ever want entries in other than ascending sort order? Using LM would allow users to decide how they want it sequenced...but would then force another process for those who want it as now...

Posted: 22 Mar 2006 10:16
by admin
j_c_hallgren wrote:Still I do wonder...would anyone ever want entries in other than ascending sort order? Using LM would allow users to decide how they want it sequenced...but would then force another process for those who want it as now...
In the case of Favorites: soon the new fav panel will be there, where you can order everything freely; so this old Favorites list (which will stay parallely to the new fav panel (or however I'll call it -- suggestions welcome: e.g. quick folders, flat tree, quick favs, fast favs... )) is okay with a forced auto-sort.

I just had another cool idea for LM (not unsimilar to your spoiled suggestion): Export/Import to/from *.txt files! So you could easily load a new set of favorites; or you could save your complex search patterns (I'll add that to LM soon!), and email them to another user, who then can easily load them... well?

Posted: 25 Mar 2006 21:38
by Gandolf
admin wrote:I just had another cool idea for LM (not unsimilar to your spoiled suggestion): Export/Import to/from *.txt files! So you could easily load a new set of favorites; or you could save your complex search patterns (I'll add that to LM soon!), and email them to another user, who then can easily load them... well?
Not sure how useful it would be. However, since I use different ini files a lot it may be an advantage to copy a favourites list from one ini file to another.

Posted: 26 Mar 2006 17:25
by admin
Gandolf wrote:
admin wrote:I just had another cool idea for LM (not unsimilar to your spoiled suggestion): Export/Import to/from *.txt files! So you could easily load a new set of favorites; or you could save your complex search patterns (I'll add that to LM soon!), and email them to another user, who then can easily load them... well?
Not sure how useful it would be. However, since I use different ini files a lot it may be an advantage to copy a favourites list from one ini file to another.
Yes, good example for a good use of this feature.

Posted: 30 Mar 2006 16:57
by j_c_hallgren
:D I definitely like the new additions to LM!
I'd maybe use the ":" instead of "," as delimeter, so that it would be..
"Find Files: Name"
that's just a preference of mine...