Page 1 of 1

Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 06 Nov 2009 13:46
by Formingus
1.Copy Later = So when we drag to copy if one copy on progress ability to have copy later so PC will not be occupied allot coz copy later will start copy after first copy Finished

2.Catalog With Sub Folders will be Nice to Arranging allot of our Items :)

Regards

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 06 Nov 2009 13:57
by zer0
Formingus wrote:1.Copy Later = So when we drag to copy if one copy on progress ability to have copy later so PC will not be occupied allot coz copy later will start copy after first copy Finished

2.Catalog With Sub Folders will be Nice to Arranging allot of our Items :)
1. I imagine this would come with XY's own copy/move operations.
2. Sort of already possible. See http://www.xyplorer.com/images/catalog.png Notice parts of the catalogue called Scripts, XY dev, Launch, Hot URLs? That's a form of categorisation that is already provided.

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 06 Nov 2009 14:27
by Formingus
but there is catalog with new item need to have sub item sub directory :)


Regards

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 06 Nov 2009 15:11
by zer0
Formingus wrote:but there is catalog with new item need to have sub item sub directory :)
Do you mean further nesting of categories in the catalogue? Should this nesting be potentially infinite? :?

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 13:48
by Formingus
zer0 wrote:
Formingus wrote:but there is catalog with new item need to have sub item sub directory :)
Do you mean further nesting of categories in the catalogue? Should this nesting be potentially infinite? :?
I mean Like This
On Catalog Need to Get Dir when we press on Dir then will open SubDir With other Dir that will have Programs On It.See example on Attachment...

Regards

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 14:12
by admin
Yes, this has been discussed from day one of the Catalog, and I was always and still are against it. The Catalog will remain as flat as is it. Otherwise it would just duplicate all the problems typical for the tree and we could just forget about the whole Catalog. If you have too many favorite things you have to redefine your notion of "favorite".

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 14:18
by Formingus
admin wrote:Yes, this has been discussed from day one of the Catalog, and I was always and still are against it. The Catalog will remain as flat as is it. Otherwise it would just duplicate all the problems typical for the tree and we could just forget about the whole Catalog. If you have too many favorite things you have to redefine your notion of "favorite".
Thks For Answer and What About

About Favorite File : On Press Favorite File go to location need 2 be executed (where is # between Favorite File and Folder Then ? )

Copy Move Later and Second Panel Tree is this discussed before

Regards

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 15:56
by j_c_hallgren
admin wrote: Otherwise it would just duplicate all the problems typical for the tree and we could just forget about the whole Catalog.
I would agree if we allowed for multiple nested levels, but disagree if we're talking about just one nested level, which we could call "Group" for example...That would allow for quite a number of items to be organized better and still not get too unwieldy, I believe.

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 07 Nov 2009 18:36
by serendipity
Regarding catalog, Don has "Switch-Catalog-On-The-Fly" in his roadmap which will allow more catalogs.

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 08 Nov 2009 13:19
by Formingus
j_c_hallgren wrote:
admin wrote: Otherwise it would just duplicate all the problems typical for the tree and we could just forget about the whole Catalog.
I would agree if we allowed for multiple nested levels, but disagree if we're talking about just one nested level, which we could call "Group" for example...That would allow for quite a number of items to be organized better and still not get too unwieldy, I believe.
Totally agree with this, so one level nothing more and we can have a perfect organized catalog
Regards

Re: Check this 2 Things Pls i think they need For Best Explorer

Posted: 08 Nov 2009 13:26
by calude
Hi all

coming back with a promised somehow auto-optimize catalog, working the same way as auto-optimize tree !!

later said Don :(

Calude