Forum for XYplorer Users and Developers
https://www.xyplorer.com/xyfc/
Nothing spectacular at all: several hundred visitors more than usual.JustinF wrote:Just curious, how much of a traffic increase has the website seen because of this...especially now that the Lifehacker article is on Digg?
If nobody beats me to it, I'll do that sometime in next day or so...mwb1100 wrote:This should be added to the wikipedia page as another 'notable' reference.
Cool, thanks!j_c_hallgren wrote:If nobody beats me to it, I'll do that sometime in next day or so...mwb1100 wrote:This should be added to the wikipedia page as another 'notable' reference.
Just spent a bit of time reworking/updating links...added dates of publication and such...had to remove one as broken (newpaper now requires payment to retrieve archived article that old) and it was basically a blog pointing to another of the links anyway.admin wrote:Cool, thanks!j_c_hallgren wrote:If nobody beats me to it, I'll do that sometime in next day or so...mwb1100 wrote:This should be added to the wikipedia page as another 'notable' reference.
Thanks!j_c_hallgren wrote:Just spent a bit of time reworking/updating links...added dates of publication and such...had to remove one as broken (newpaper now requires payment to retrieve archived article that old) and it was basically a blog pointing to another of the links anyway.admin wrote:Cool, thanks!j_c_hallgren wrote:If nobody beats me to it, I'll do that sometime in next day or so...mwb1100 wrote:This should be added to the wikipedia page as another 'notable' reference.
... looks like XY has only one supporter.Agreed! But we need to have someone who will keep any changes "under control" and given that I was the one who got entry restored, I don't want to lose it again...though I could work thru someone else, I guess?admin wrote:Thanks!
Although it might have been nice if somebody apart from "Whr76" did some work on that entry...
Not sure if that would work, I'm just a friendly wiki user.j_c_hallgren wrote:Agreed! But we need to have someone who will keep any changes "under control" and given that I was the one who got entry restored, I don't want to lose it again...though I could work thru someone else, I guess?admin wrote:Thanks!
Although it might have been nice if somebody apart from "Whr76" did some work on that entry...
Well, I suspect that you changing the article would be considered a "COI" (conflict of interest) given your relationship to product..admin wrote:Not sure if that would work, I'm just a friendly wiki user.