Page 1 of 1
Column View?
Posted: 02 Feb 2008 09:26
by vlad1966
Will their be an option to view directories in column view like Mac OS X has?
This would be great since I love being able to view more than 2 levels of my HDD at one time - makes moving or copying files very quick.
Re: Column View?
Posted: 02 Feb 2008 10:00
by admin
Please explain. I know the Mac Column View but never understood what's so great about it.
Posted: 02 Feb 2008 20:51
by lukescammell
I hate column view (I work on OSX) and have also never understood the attraction - perhaps you can explain.
The "tree-list-view" on the other hand I can see the use for (selecting items from multiple folders at the same time).
Posted: 03 Feb 2008 07:19
by vlad1966
In column view, you can see multiple levels of your HDD, not just 1 or 2 like in tree view, but as many levels as the size of your monitor will allow.
Posted: 03 Feb 2008 08:37
by admin
vlad1966 wrote:In column view, you can see multiple levels of your HDD, not just 1 or 2 like in tree view, but as many levels as the size of your monitor will allow.
...1 or 2 like in tree view... sorry, I don't understand. My tree has many more levels and it can show them.

Posted: 03 Feb 2008 08:40
by j_c_hallgren
I've not seen this view as Im a Windows guy only, and don't quite follow it, so can you provide a screen print here or a pointer to some online docs that shows an example of it, so the other non-Mac folks can also see what you mean?
Posted: 03 Feb 2008 13:36
by jacky
admin wrote:vlad1966 wrote:In column view, you can see multiple levels of your HDD, not just 1 or 2 like in tree view, but as many levels as the size of your monitor will allow.
...1 or 2 like in tree view... sorry, I don't understand. My tree has many more levels and it can show them.

I don't really know this view either, but I think it offers like "permanently" what the "vista breadcrumb" offers on demand, that is the list of all other folders on the same level that each and every of the folders on current path.
I'm not sure what's no great about this, to me it sounds like an awful way to waste a huge bunch of pixels, but that may be me, or I may be wrong about that view...

Posted: 03 Feb 2008 16:40
by vlad1966
LOL! For some reason I expected everyone knew what column view is.
Check this link:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikibooks/e ... n_View.png
Wiki explanation:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_T ... olumn_View
The way it works is:
Imagine you have a folder called X. Inside X is a folder called XX, Inside XX is XXX, inside XXX is XXXX, inside XXXX - you get the idea. Basically, Imagine having a folder with tons of folders within folders. With Column view, you can see all levels of each folder
AT THE SAME TIME AS LONG AS YOU HAVE A MONITOR THAT IS LONG ENOUGH.
It's sort of like seeing an Excel spreadsheet. You have column A , B , C, etc. & of course you can see everything in each column AT THE SAME TIME. Apologies to the PC-only folks, but Tree View in Microsoft's File browser sucks in comparison, at least for me.
For some of you who want to try something similar, try out WinBrowser:
http://www.winbrowser.com/winbrowser.htm
It works OK with XP, but hasn't been updated in ages & don't think it works with Vista.
Posted: 03 Feb 2008 19:29
by j_c_hallgren
vlad1966 wrote:LOL! For some reason I expected everyone knew what column view is.
Sorry, but some of us have only used a Mac for less than 1hr over the course of a few years, and that was only in a store to see how they handled and worked with my website as they had the Mac's connected to Net...so now, I've seen your examples, and I just don't get it...doesn't seem like it would be of any use to me and takes up
way too much room for any possible benefits, IMHO...sorry!
Posted: 04 Feb 2008 14:11
by Tamil
Posted: 04 Feb 2008 17:10
by infimum
Umm...do I feel unnecessary animosity among posters because of the OP's reference to Mac?
Anyway, I personally see this as a request to give another option of moving among folders. As it stands, XY doesn't give an option of branching out from any given point in/outside of a drive, a la Vista breadcrumb. There is a tree, but it quickly gets unmanageably big. What is the best way to move from a folder deep in drive C to a folder deep in drive F with a mouse? Click the nearest folder in your favorite list?
Posted: 04 Feb 2008 17:30
by j_c_hallgren
infimum wrote:Umm...do I feel unnecessary animosity among posters because of the OP's reference to Mac?
Not in my case...I just was totally unfamiliar with this scheme due to it's origin...and after refreshing my mind with Tamil's thread, there are other variants also.
infimum wrote:There is a tree, but it quickly gets unmanageably big. What is the best way to move from a folder deep in drive C to a folder deep in drive F with a mouse? Click the nearest folder in your favorite list?
In that case, I would most likely do a cut/paste...and it's likely due to my unfamilarity with this scheme, but how would this differ from having to scroll mostly vertically in your example? Since only one path can be 'exploded' at a time, as I see it, so while it would be good to move from a level upwards/downwards/sideways in same path, but wouldn't you have to dynamically explode the receiving path?
Posted: 04 Feb 2008 18:52
by infimum
j_c_hallgren wrote:but how would this differ from having to scroll mostly vertically in your example? Since only one path can be 'exploded' at a time, as I see it, so while it would be good to move from a level upwards/downwards/sideways in same path, but wouldn't you have to dynamically explode the receiving path?
I am not sure if I understood your question or we are on the same page. But in other file managers, if you want to go from a folder deep in drive C to a folder deep in drive F, you go like this.
Your current path is shown in address bar (or tab or anywhere):
C:\aa\bb\cc\dd
mouse over or right-click C:\ gives in a drop-down box
D:
E:
F:
mouse over or r-click F: gives:
\ee
\ff
\gg
mouse over or r-click \gg gives:
hh
\ii
\jj
mouse over or r-click \jj gives:
\kk
\ll
\mm
now click \mm, you are in:
F:\gg\jj\mm
Less mouse movement and clicks. It's hard to explain verbally but so many people like this kind of movement that many file managers adopt it now.