Slow startup, etc.
Posted: 02 Jan 2020 20:20
Hi!
I'm evaluating the product, but it has a few annoying bugs or problems:
1) It starts relatively slow! Opening a folder takes at least about 1 second, which makes the whole OS seem slow... Windows Explorer opens immediately, and competing products like Directory Opus also start without any noticable delay. Obviously, XYplorer is not coded primarily for speed, which would be essential for a file explorer! It should probably be rewritten in a faster language (like C++) or maybe it could be held in memory after first start (like Directory Opus), so that subsequent folders open immediately. Otherwise it's really annoying to use...
2) When several folders are open and the settings are changed in one, then this one is closed and after that any other, the settings are not saved! Seems always the last folder saves its current settings, so they get lost when closing folders in the wrong order...
3) Having the "<app>" tag mandatory in the caption is an extreme nuisance! Horrible... "how dare you!" ;-)
4) The XYplorer icon makes it impossible to recognize folders in the task bar - if you are used to Windows Explorer! So if you ever expect anyone to use XYplorer as a Windows Explorer replacement, it should be possible to use the standard folder icons so that the taskbar (and all other views) look familiar...
5) Explorer integration is poor. I know this has been discussed before, but ithems like "This PC", "Network", "Documents", "Recycle Bin", etc. must also open in XYplorer if I choose to use it as an Explorer replacement. If not, its confusing and annoying (especially because different copy methods are used, different views, etc.) Poor overal experience.
6) Different folders do not seem to remember their view options (e.g. Tiles, Details, etc.) They should!
These are the most obvious problems I encountered after short testing. Good program, but not quite ready to really replace Windows Explorer...
Regards!
I'm evaluating the product, but it has a few annoying bugs or problems:
1) It starts relatively slow! Opening a folder takes at least about 1 second, which makes the whole OS seem slow... Windows Explorer opens immediately, and competing products like Directory Opus also start without any noticable delay. Obviously, XYplorer is not coded primarily for speed, which would be essential for a file explorer! It should probably be rewritten in a faster language (like C++) or maybe it could be held in memory after first start (like Directory Opus), so that subsequent folders open immediately. Otherwise it's really annoying to use...
2) When several folders are open and the settings are changed in one, then this one is closed and after that any other, the settings are not saved! Seems always the last folder saves its current settings, so they get lost when closing folders in the wrong order...
3) Having the "<app>" tag mandatory in the caption is an extreme nuisance! Horrible... "how dare you!" ;-)
4) The XYplorer icon makes it impossible to recognize folders in the task bar - if you are used to Windows Explorer! So if you ever expect anyone to use XYplorer as a Windows Explorer replacement, it should be possible to use the standard folder icons so that the taskbar (and all other views) look familiar...
5) Explorer integration is poor. I know this has been discussed before, but ithems like "This PC", "Network", "Documents", "Recycle Bin", etc. must also open in XYplorer if I choose to use it as an Explorer replacement. If not, its confusing and annoying (especially because different copy methods are used, different views, etc.) Poor overal experience.
6) Different folders do not seem to remember their view options (e.g. Tiles, Details, etc.) They should!
These are the most obvious problems I encountered after short testing. Good program, but not quite ready to really replace Windows Explorer...
Regards!