XYplorer Beta Club

I'm not sure when this happenned, but when I go to My Computer now, my stats in statusbar seemed to be wrong :

total free: 0 bytes, capacity: 0 bytes | all local disks: 0 bytes used, 0 bytes free (0%)

Woah. I could trace it back to v6.30... tztztz

admin wrote:Woah. I could trace it back to v6.30... tztztz

Damn, we got slow to report that one, haven't we!

So, speaking of 30, how come I am running XY v6.60.0030 right now, I just noticed this and find it odd because the last entry on the beta log/history is for v6.60.0020, or am I completely missing something obvious ?

jacky wrote:

admin wrote:Woah. I could trace it back to v6.30... tztztz

Damn, we got slow to report that one, haven't we!

So, speaking of 30, how come I am running XY v6.60.0030 right now, I just noticed this and find it odd because the last entry on the beta log/history is for v6.60.0020, or am I completely missing something obvious ?

Yep, sometimes it makes me wonder. I know how many paying customers have, but I have no idea how many non-paying "customers", and have no good idea how many of all of them actually use the program and for what. Then I don't know how many of them, when they spot a bug, (would) get active and tell me about it. Many "don't knows".

The difference between 30 and 20 was not worthy to be noted in the history.
I jumped from 00 to 10 to 20 to 30 because these were post-official-release bugs. I wanted to express the "importance" of the updates.

A better way would have to been to have no post-official-release bugs

Well, I'm sure I had gone to MC before, but apparently for some reason I never looked at those global stats, cause I never noticed that bug before.
But it is true that sometimes I notice something or have an idea for a new wish, but don't report it cause I'm too busy doing something else. And then, on occasion, I might forget about it (for a while)...

It's also true that unless people are active here already, sometimes they might see a bug but not care to report it... too much trouble (especially for a "little one" like that).

admin wrote:The difference between 30 and 20 was not worthy to be noted in the history.
I jumped from 00 to 10 to 20 to 30 because these were post-official-release bugs. I wanted to express the "importance" of the updates.

So the difference between 20 and 30 wasn't worthy of being noted, yet it was important enough to be part of an official release and thus you wanted to express the "importance" of the update... ok... sure...
Just glad I am not crazy

jacky wrote:

admin wrote:The difference between 30 and 20 was not worthy to be noted in the history.
I jumped from 00 to 10 to 20 to 30 because these were post-official-release bugs. I wanted to express the "importance" of the updates.

So the difference between 20 and 30 wasn't worthy of being noted, yet it was important enough to be part of an official release and thus you wanted to express the "importance" of the update... ok... sure...
Just glad I am not crazy

jacky wrote: Just glad I am not crazy

Sorry for you, jacky.
The genius must be crazy

PeterH wrote:

jacky wrote: Just glad I am not crazy

Sorry for you, jacky.
The genius must be crazy

"The difference between craziness and genius is, that genius got its limits!"
(slightly modified citation of Albert Einstein; he compared stupidity and genius)