An SC for building thumbnails
Posted: 22 Feb 2018 15:35
Don, I know you have supported many changes and new scripting commands regarding thumbnails, but I'm wondering if you could possibly suport another? In some ways I'm surprised it hasn't been asked before since there have been so many other scripting developments on thumbnail related items (i.e., rethumb, unthumb, savethumb, thumbsconf). What I was thinking is a new SC for actually generating thumbnails or if the cache for the folder already exist, obviously it would be refreshing or rebuilding like the CID #501.
It would be named something like, SC thumbbuild or similar. It would take a folder as the first parameter and a thumbnail size (e.g., 1,2,or 3) as a second parameter and if possible, would have a flag that would accomplish the build recursively for supplied image folder. I'm not sure if this is totally out of the realm of possibilities in XYplorer, but could the thumbnail generation actually occur without being present in the specified folder or is that just not possible based on the way thumbs are generated (i.e., would XYplorer be capable of generating and writing the cache files to the thumbnail database without being in the current folder)? Or, if that's not possible could you have a flag which would accomplish the build in a second instance and exit that instance when done? As always, thanks for considering.
It would be named something like, SC thumbbuild or similar. It would take a folder as the first parameter and a thumbnail size (e.g., 1,2,or 3) as a second parameter and if possible, would have a flag that would accomplish the build recursively for supplied image folder. I'm not sure if this is totally out of the realm of possibilities in XYplorer, but could the thumbnail generation actually occur without being present in the specified folder or is that just not possible based on the way thumbs are generated (i.e., would XYplorer be capable of generating and writing the cache files to the thumbnail database without being in the current folder)? Or, if that's not possible could you have a flag which would accomplish the build in a second instance and exit that instance when done? As always, thanks for considering.