Page 1 of 1
Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 18 Mar 2015 11:30
by admin
[Split]
Hmm, "Quick Select", that would have probably a better name than "Flat Select"...

Re: [Script] TimeSync 1.1 Beta2 - January 8, 2015
Posted: 18 Mar 2015 12:06
by TheQwerty
//off-topic
admin wrote:Hmm, "Quick Select", that would have probably a better name than "Flat Select"...

You know "Quick Select" was how I referred to it in my
original wish. Instead you waited for Marco to wish something similar (probably keyword alerts for Beyoncè!

) and came up with your own odd and not very consistent name.

Re: [Script] TimeSync 1.1 Beta2 - January 8, 2015
Posted: 18 Mar 2015 12:37
by admin
Well.
The good thing about Flat Select: FS was still free, whereas QS is already used for Quick Search.

Re: [Script] TimeSync 1.1 Beta2 - January 8, 2015
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 08:10
by admin
admin wrote:Well.
The good thing about Flat Select: FS was still free, whereas QS is already used for Quick Search.

OK, I could use QSL for Quick Select.
Yes, this is still on my mind, spinning...
is there anybody out there who has good reasons to prefer "Flat Select" to "Quick Select"? Speak now! Otherwise I would change it...
Re: [Script] TimeSync 1.1 Beta2 - January 8, 2015
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 12:58
by bdeshi
Recycle: FS => Fast Select ?
QSL is very odd in that its abbrev for "Select" is very different from what its buddies use.
Re: [Script] TimeSync 1.1 Beta2 - January 8, 2015
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 13:26
by admin
The important thing here is the analogy to Quick Search.
Odd acronyms don't give me many headaches.
Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 14:37
by bdeshi
then in retrospect QuickSearch had better been Quick Find...

Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 14:41
by Stef123
My $ 0.02 on it: I don't like Flat Select.
FastSelect, SpeedSelect, DirectSelect, InstantSelect, no complaints about QuickSelect either.
Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 16:20
by Filehero
Spot Select?
Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 17:23
by kodyman
Stef123 wrote:My $ 0.02 on it: I don't like Flat Select.
FastSelect, SpeedSelect, DirectSelect, InstantSelect, no complaints about QuickSelect either.
Agree with any of these.
Flat and Select don't sound right together. No ring.
Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 17:50
by TheQwerty
You know... the original impetus for using
Quick Select was the impression that many of the goto shortcuts are named similarly.
However, looking back at the documentation it is only
Quick Search and
Quick Visual Filters - and only the former gets the acronym treatment.
None of the other shortcuts use the
Quick prefix: Spot & Jump, DOS commands, Alias. For a brief time in history we had
Quick Scripting but that fell out of favor when the related option was hard-coded to on.
As it shares syntax with
Spot & Jump maybe it should just be lumped in with them,
Spot, Jump, & Select? Though I'd suggest actually making it
Jump, Spot, & Select (JSS) - this way it helps remind the user how many '>' they need for each feature.

Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 18:37
by grindax
.
Re: Flat Select vs Quick Select
Posted: 09 Apr 2015 18:40
by admin
JSS
