Re: Reviewed by dual pane freak
Posted: 24 Oct 2006 04:43
Dual pane in its full implementation would require dual trees, one for each pane...I was suggesting only one tree but dual tabs...maybe it's because I've been using a variant of dual pane for about 20+- years (including on mainframe) that I find it so necessary? To me, it could be somewhat equated with having a choice of seeing tree or list but not both...and that would be pretty much unworkable, right?admin wrote:Sounds like dualpane to me. Even worse, dualpane + tree. My monitor says "no".
Now I'd agree that having dual tabs/panes is not needed, maybe, 95% or more of the time, but in that remaining 5% or so, it's absolutely crucial to accomplish task in a timely manner.