Page 3 of 3

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 08:08
by jaydee
So, who is twisting the words now about time machine? If you do not bother to self-check yourself, at least do not point the accusing finger at another. That is the only decent thing to do, IMHO.

Image

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 08:32
by Borut
I overlooked the sentence
I recommend you do the same and then you'll be able to afford a copy of XY too.
and I apologize for that.

So, let me just go to the facts of XYplorer: There is no support for old program versions in a sense that bugs in old versions are being eliminated. The idea is to eliminate bugs while developing new features/versions at the same time.

Therefore my advices about checking the latest version and - if it suits you - trying to obtain a life license. (I have one for some years now and - in my view - the investment turned back many times.) At least, I would do that, if I ware you.

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 08:37
by j_c_hallgren
jaydee wrote:. But to tell me to take a time machine? That is out of line.

but so far, I've never heard of any user being told to take a time machine, except told to me here.
Seems that you're not parsing English the same way some of us are...NO one told you to "take" a time machine...You were in fact originally asked if you "used" a time machine because your one statement was quite inconsistent.

You just even quoted where you stated that you had used XY ver 11.90.0100 since 2 years ago...what grindax was pointing out was that 2 yrs ago, the vers that was available could not have been that recent a vers but would have been 9.90.1018 as shown in http://www.xyplorer.com/xyfc/viewtopic. ... 025#p60326 and that the vers 11.90.0100 you were using was from Jan 15 2013. That mismatch in vers and dates is what (to me) started this whole "time machine" thing, ok?

And asking when another extended usage free vers of a paid product like XY will be available makes it appear that you're not interested in purchasing XY...you've been asked why you're not using the limited time vers of latest beta to verify status of the bugs you've encountered and without any reply, one can only presume you're not willing to do so.

We're not twisting statements here...we're just reading your statements as written and they are not matching up.

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 11:02
by jaydee
j_c_hallgren wrote:
jaydee wrote:. But to tell me to take a time machine? That is out of line.

but so far, I've never heard of any user being told to take a time machine, except told to me here.
Seems that you're not parsing English the same way some of us are...NO one told you to "take" a time machine...You were in fact originally asked if you "used" a time machine because your one statement was quite inconsistent.

You just even quoted where you stated that you had used XY ver 11.90.0100 since 2 years ago...what grindax was pointing out was that 2 yrs ago, the vers that was available could not have been that recent a vers but would have been 9.90.1018 as shown in http://www.xyplorer.com/xyfc/viewtopic. ... 025#p60326 and that the vers 11.90.0100 you were using was from Jan 15 2013. That mismatch in vers and dates is what (to me) started this whole "time machine" thing, ok?

And asking when another extended usage free vers of a paid product like XY will be available makes it appear that you're not interested in purchasing XY...you've been asked why you're not using the limited time vers of latest beta to verify status of the bugs you've encountered and without any reply, one can only presume you're not willing to do so.

We're not twisting statements here...we're just reading your statements as written and they are not matching up.
You seriously need to go for an English comprehension refresh. He has already apologised for making that 'time machine' statement and you still come around arguing over spilled milk, what a douchebag you're turning out to be. The rest of your inane post is pure presumptions on your part. You do need to go for some serious professional service training if you wish to represent a company in its public forum. That's all I have for you for now. Ridiculous! Mindboggling!

Image

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 07 Jun 2013 11:14
by admin
:om: :blackstorm: Oh, jaydee has suddenly left us. So let's not waste more energy on this thread. :cup: :whistle:

Re: Long filename & long filepath Support & Volume Shadow Co

Posted: 13 Jun 2013 10:43
by admin
Out of string space: Fixed.