Forum for XYplorer Users and Developers
https://www.xyplorer.com/xyfc/
Yes, maybe in a 2nd step. I will keep it simple for now.RalphM wrote:Unless you enable the user at least to see that some items in his merged catalog are "dirty" and provide a way to reload the current server version?!admin wrote:OK. So if it is not stored locally, then I should probably disallow and editing/repositioning of merged items simply because it would be lost on next start. Right?
Well, any word on the new Catalog Merging feature?RalphM wrote:Great, looking forward to see this evolve.
Didn't get to test it yet, but it sounds promising. Will check soon and keep you posted.admin wrote:Well, any word on the new Catalog Merging feature?
Awesome! Time-saver.admin wrote:Well, any word on the new Catalog Merging feature?RalphM wrote:Great, looking forward to see this evolve.
Yep, same here. Killer feature.serendipity wrote:Awesome! Time-saver.admin wrote:Well, any word on the new Catalog Merging feature?RalphM wrote:Great, looking forward to see this evolve.
BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?admin wrote:Yep, same here. Killer feature.
admin wrote:BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?admin wrote:Yep, same here. Killer feature.
QuickDic saysYou didn't like the first name I gave it then? "Cascading Catalogs"admin wrote:BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?
I was thinking of Consolidated -or- Combined as suggested words.RalphM wrote:You didn't like the first name I gave it then? "Cascading Catalogs"admin wrote:BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?
Certainly sounds good, and is better than "Catalog Merging".RalphM wrote:You didn't like the first name I gave it then? "Cascading Catalogs"admin wrote:BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?
Similar but not as good as "Cascading Catalogs" IMO.Stefan wrote:admin wrote:BTW, marketingwise I find "Catalog Merging" a bit pale. Any buzzy suggestions anybody...?admin wrote:Yep, same here. Killer feature.
Commingle Catalogs
Coalescing Catalogs
Compounding Catalogs
Mashup Catalogs
Code: Select all
Catalog One
| Items
|_Catalog Two
| Items
|_Catalog Three
| ItemsCode: Select all
Catalog One
Items
Catalog Two
Items
Catalog Three
ItemsEmbed? Embedded Catalogs?Stefan wrote:What would be an term for merge only for an time?
No idea, just brainstorming:
side by side catalogs
Compounding Catalogs
composing
catalog stacking
supercharge
catalog collection
multi-level catalogs
Sorry, but to me that term (decentralized functionality) means absolutely nothing in this context...I still think that combined or consolidated are better terms for this since they don't imply being irreversible in all cases.admin wrote:While I now tend to think that "Embed" should replace "Merge" (which for me connotes something irreversible) in the interface, I have the following idea for marketing purposes: decentralized functionality.