Re: Support for Portable Devices
Posted: 03 Jan 2015 16:31
Report from the lab: Making good progress. Next week you should be able to list your files on portable devices. 
Forum for XYplorer Users and Developers
https://www.xyplorer.com/xyfc/
admin wrote:Making good progress. Next week you should be able to list your files on portable devices.
admin wrote:Report from the lab: Making good progress. Next week you should be able to list your files on portable devices.
C'mon, you don't really expect Don to come up with such a quarter-baked solution, don't you? Rather he would resign, I guess.Mesh wrote:Just to clarify, when you say list your files, does that mean browse only? No copying/moving files to, from, or within?
You´re meshin' with the Don!Mesh wrote:
Just to clarify, when you say list your files, does that mean browse only? No copying/moving files to, from, or within?
It is the way to go and I would expect it to be so. The bases for the legendary stability of betas.PeterH wrote:(In other words: it seems Don's working step for step...)
Frankly, I haven't expected the remaining 5% taking that long.admin wrote:..., but it's really a LOT to do.
Yikes. Sounds like even more "fun". It's crazy how sometimes we plan so much but unexpected things always turn things a full 180.admin wrote:It's an interface to a file system format that could not have been predicted years ago. XY is a highly optimized machine. Optimization is largely based on assumptions. These assumptions are wrong now for many many places.
Code: Select all
v14.80.0005 - 2015-01-07 20:53
+ Portable Devices: Now you can browse a device in tree and list. You cannot
do much else yet, but the Breadcrumb Bar should work, the Address Bar, even
image thumbnails and thumbnails caching (though the thumbnails are much
smaller than under Windows).Code: Select all
You cannot do much else yet, ...Code: Select all
- USB Path, aka "USB Device Path", is the "real" path to an item on a
Portable Device as it is understood by the Windows shell.Code: Select all
- The speed is pretty lousy, ...There's is some room for optimization later...