XYplorer Beta Club

admin wrote:Patience... users can be slow sometimes...

... and admins are sometimes just users as well?!
Naturally your thougths about my suggestions are the most important ones.

admin wrote:BTW, did the network get any faster?

Yep, the network list loads much faster, but it's actually a dead end, because you can't open any network ressources from that list and see the underlying directory structure or ressources like the windows explorer offers?

Tried to insert two screenshots here to show the differences, but couldn't get them displayed, so I might send them as an email to your support mail address instead.

RalphM wrote:

admin wrote:Patience... users can be slow sometimes...

... and admins are sometimes just users as well?!

I've been waiting for some users to step forward first.
My own opinion as a user: I'm not missing anything of what you are wishing. I hardly ever shut TrackerV3 down, so I really don't care so much about start parameters.

RalphM wrote:Yep, the network list loads much faster, but it's actually a dead end, because you can't open any network ressources from that list and see the underlying directory structure or ressources like the windows explorer offers?

AHA! So it changed from before?! WHY doesn't anybody tell me??? If I can't rely on some user feedback here (beyond "gimme gimme gimme more!"), I'll shut this forum down in no time.

Send me screenshots from before and after, if you can, thanks!

admin wrote:Send me screenshots from before and after, if you can, thanks!

I sent you screenshots of Windows Explorer vs TrackerV3, but as I recall, I was never able to open any network ressources in TrackerV3 so far.

The list looks the same as in previous versions, the only thing that changed, is the list displaying much faster.

RalphM wrote:I was never able to open any network ressources in TrackerV3 so far.

Bad! And surprising. I never heard of this problem before... Can other users open network ressources??

RalphM wrote:The list looks the same as in previous versions, the only thing that changed, is the list displaying much faster.

Good!

Never tried, never could. I blew up my network a while back (dismantled the other computer). That was before I found TrackerV3. Sorry.

Manifold wrote:Never tried, never could. I blew up my network a while back (dismantled the other computer). That was before I found TrackerV3. Sorry.

Thanks Manifold, I'm sorry for you.

Still waiting for somebody with a positive message...

I have the same problem with the nethood. But I think the bug forum is a better place for this problem. I've made a new topic there. I hope this is OK.

http://www.trackerv3.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1265

RalphM wrote:What do other users think of that approach??

I like it. It's definately better than the "two-ini" approach. In fact, if you have a lot of nice parameters, you don't need the /i switch for multiple ini files, do you?

Chris Wood wrote:

RalphM wrote:What do other users think of that approach??

I like it. It's definately better than the "two-ini" approach. In fact, if you have a lot of nice parameters, you don't need the /i switch for multiple ini files, do you?

Have you all seen the new tabbed browsing, and especially the Finding Tabs? They are much more powerful than switches...

Agreed. Personally, I have no need for switches.