Page 2 of 2

Posted: 20 Oct 2006 21:53
by John Bee
jacky wrote:
John Bee wrote:I am glad you did this.
So am I :)
Ahh....., Great minds think alike! :wink:

John
Win2K
0033
1,600ms

Posted: 24 Oct 2006 16:30
by admin
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!

Posted: 24 Oct 2006 16:57
by jacky
admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!
bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)

Posted: 24 Oct 2006 17:00
by admin
jacky wrote:
admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!
bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)
Yes, you're right. :oops: Absolute values are not interesting as long as it's getting faster and faster. And tomorrow it will be faster again! :D

Posted: 24 Oct 2006 17:09
by lukescammell
That and P4s suck, as even Intel acknowledges now :D

Posted: 24 Oct 2006 18:14
by John Bee
jacky wrote:
admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!
bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)
Well, I have an Athlon 3200+ sitting in an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe MB with 1 gb of ram.

Don't forget, I have show folder sizes turned on!

John
Win2K
0038
1,956ms