Auto-select

John Bee · Post by **John Bee** » 20 Oct 2006 21:53

jacky wrote:
John Bee wrote:I am glad you did this.
So am I

Ahh....., Great minds think alike!

John
Win2K
0033
1,600ms

Post by **admin** » 24 Oct 2006 16:30

John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms

May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!

jacky · Post by **jacky** » 24 Oct 2006 16:57

admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!

bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)

Post by **admin** » 24 Oct 2006 17:00

jacky wrote:
admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!
bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)

Yes, you're right.

Absolute values are not interesting as long as it's getting faster and faster. And tomorrow it will be faster again!

lukescammell · Post by **lukescammell** » 24 Oct 2006 17:09

That and P4s suck, as even Intel acknowledges now

John Bee · Post by **John Bee** » 24 Oct 2006 18:14

jacky wrote:
admin wrote:
John Bee wrote:Win2K
0033
1,600ms
May I ask what computer you use? The latest version 0041 shows/loads on my Athlon XP 2700+ in 516/555 ms!
bah, computer isn't all, I mean I have a P4 3Ghz w/1GB RAM and XY showed/loaded in 1 796/2 086 ms (though it's a great improvement, 0038 did it 4 151/4 356ms)

Well, I have an Athlon 3200+ sitting in an Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe MB with 1 gb of ram.

Don't forget, I have show folder sizes turned on!

John
Win2K
0038
1,956ms