64bit version?

Please check the FAQ (https://www.xyplorer.com/faq.php) before posting a question...
Slowfox
Posts: 15
Joined: 07 Feb 2012 04:35

64bit version?

Post by Slowfox »

Several important context menu items don't show up in my XYplorer's file context menu. I am running Windows 7 64bit.

I believe the reason is that the missing items are 64bit programs, which do not show up in 32bit XYplorer.

I am still evaluating the trial version, and for me this is a "no-go".

When do you expect to have a 64bit version available?

Thanks.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 60357
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
Contact:

Re: 64bit version?

Post by admin »

Can't give a date but I'm ready to go at any moment. It's the compiler writers that slow it down. :roll:

Generally, to everybody on 64bit Windows: When you decided to go for 64bit you decided to leave the 32bit world. I'm sure you had good reasons to do so (and did not just believe the hype), but now you have to bear the consequences. IMHO as of today there is no 64bit file manager existing that could compare to XY. Well, I'm glad that this isn't my problem! :P

Slowfox
Posts: 15
Joined: 07 Feb 2012 04:35

Re: 64bit version?

Post by Slowfox »

May I ask, which compiler?

eil
Posts: 1617
Joined: 13 Jan 2011 19:44

Re: 64bit version?

Post by eil »

Slowfox wrote:May I ask, which compiler?
Visual Basic compiler for 64bit.
Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768

Slowfox
Posts: 15
Joined: 07 Feb 2012 04:35

Re: 64bit version?

Post by Slowfox »

I am afraid you may have a loooooong wait.

Support for Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 ended on March 31, 2005. Extended support ended in March 2008.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 60357
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
Contact:

Re: 64bit version?

Post by admin »

Slowfox wrote:I am afraid you may have a loooooong wait.

Support for Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 ended on March 31, 2005. Extended support ended in March 2008.
Nothing new. But not only MS can write compilers. Just as Borland wrote a C compiler, anybody with the skills can write a VB compiler.

Slowfox
Posts: 15
Joined: 07 Feb 2012 04:35

Re: 64bit version?

Post by Slowfox »

I hope you find a compiler soon.
XY is the best file manager I've seen.

FeatureCreep
Posts: 162
Joined: 02 Dec 2011 21:18

Re: 64bit version?

Post by FeatureCreep »

admin wrote:Can't give a date but I'm ready to go at any moment. It's the compiler writers that slow it down. :roll:

Generally, to everybody on 64bit Windows: When you decided to go for 64bit you decided to leave the 32bit world. I'm sure you had good reasons to do so (and did not just believe the hype), but now you have to bear the consequences. IMHO as of today there is no 64bit file manager existing that could compare to XY. Well, I'm glad that this isn't my problem! :P
For most people the decision is made for them when they buy a new PC. Most of the ones on offer are now 64 bit and sales of 64 bit Win 7 now predominate.
IMHO as of today there is no 64bit file manager existing that could compare to XY.
I wholeheartedly agree but the rest of your answer troubles me. :?

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 60357
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
Contact:

Re: 64bit version?

Post by admin »

FeatureCreep wrote:For most people the decision is made for them when they buy a new PC. Most of the ones on offer are now 64 bit and sales of 64 bit Win 7 now predominate.
Yes, the stupidity is systemic.

FeatureCreep
Posts: 162
Joined: 02 Dec 2011 21:18

Re: 64bit version?

Post by FeatureCreep »

Don, you risk alienating the majority of Windows users.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 60357
Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
Contact:

Re: 64bit version?

Post by admin »

FeatureCreep wrote:Don, you risk alienating the majority of Windows users.
Yeah, I should have attached the ironic emoticon as a safety belt. (It's carnival...)

eil
Posts: 1617
Joined: 13 Jan 2011 19:44

Re: 64bit version?

Post by eil »

admin wrote:
FeatureCreep wrote:For most people the decision is made for them when they buy a new PC. Most of the ones on offer are now 64 bit and sales of 64 bit Win 7 now predominate.
Yes, the stupidity is systemic.
i love this answer! :lol: 'cause i share this opinion. :mrgreen:
Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768

FeatureCreep
Posts: 162
Joined: 02 Dec 2011 21:18

Re: 64bit version?

Post by FeatureCreep »

Yeah, I should have attached the ironic emoticon as a safety belt. (It's carnival...)
Well enjoy the carnival. :D Kölle Alaaf!

PeterH
Posts: 2776
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 20:39
Location: Germany

Re: 64bit version?

Post by PeterH »

admin wrote:
FeatureCreep wrote:For most people the decision is made for them when they buy a new PC. Most of the ones on offer are now 64 bit and sales of 64 bit Win 7 now predominate.
Yes, the stupidity is systemic.
That's correct!

Though it's simple to solve: buy no windows, and you don't need XY!

I remember times when on buying windows the reaction was:
admin wrote:Yes, the stupidity is systemic.
(We want DOS, we want 16+4bit, and we want XTREE! That was a good time!)
W7(x64) SP1 German
( +WXP SP3 )

jjk
Posts: 202
Joined: 10 Oct 2007 20:11
Location: Paris

Re: 64bit version?

Post by jjk »

PeterH wrote: (We want DOS, we want 16+4bit, and we want XTREE! That was a good time!)
Before XTREE I used Tree-view (one file : tv.exe 49421 bytes), not as powerful but very efficient.
Yes, it was the good time ! (before 1989, but which year exactly, I don't remember)

Post Reply