Nope, too much work.
Custom path aliases in tabs
Re: Custom path aliases in tabs
So, it's tomorrow (maybe) for TTT - Tree Trunk Trail.
Windows 11, 23H2 Build 22631.3447 at 100% 2560x1440
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 60782
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
- Contact:
Re: Custom path aliases in tabs
Or tomorrow. It's more than I thought.
I now think "Rapid Access Folders" is a better name than "Rapid Access Tree". It better fits what it is, a collection of folders, not a tree.
I now think "Rapid Access Folders" is a better name than "Rapid Access Tree". It better fits what it is, a collection of folders, not a tree.
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY Twitter
Re: Custom path aliases in tabs
But it's still only for using inside tree panel(as i understand), so maybe RAFT?(Rapid Access Folders Tree)
upd:: my bad, wrong order.
upd:: my bad, wrong order.
Last edited by eil on 03 May 2024 00:40, edited 2 times in total.
Win 7 SP1 x64 100% 1366x768
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 60782
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
- Contact:
Re: Custom path aliases in tabs
Those folders work all over the place, not just in the tree. The tree section is now simply called Rapid Access.
- Attachments
-
- RapidAccess.png (5.9 KiB) Viewed 236 times
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY Twitter
Re: Custom path aliases in tabs
Yes, cool feature (and yeah, much more useful than the The Glider ).
I wish RAF could become a "real" tree. Afaiu, currently it's a tree with an (hard coded) abstract root node and non-abstract leaf children where the leafs are a user configurable ordered list.
How about nested abstract nodes? I would like to use abstract nodes to build deeper structures. For example, I'd like to put all my paper folders under a "ghost" node "Paper Folders" (the term "virtual folder" is a better fit, but already in use).
Any change in the (far) future?
I wish RAF could become a "real" tree. Afaiu, currently it's a tree with an (hard coded) abstract root node and non-abstract leaf children where the leafs are a user configurable ordered list.
How about nested abstract nodes? I would like to use abstract nodes to build deeper structures. For example, I'd like to put all my paper folders under a "ghost" node "Paper Folders" (the term "virtual folder" is a better fit, but already in use).
Any change in the (far) future?