Stef123 wrote:Why are you mocking me? I do not suddenly "claim" to be affected. I ran a quick test to check up on this, how it applies to my folder thumbs that I've created over the past months.
Not intending to mock.
My reading of your first posts was not that you had run into '
desktop.ini' being preferred to 'folder.jpg' but that you were afraid you might.
Which is why I said 'why not wait and see how often you run into this possible conflict' of
desktop.ini being set - because thus far it hadn't sounded like you'd ever seen it in the wild. Your reply to that was that you're seeing 'a whole avalanche' of them.
Stef123 wrote:In fact, it was YOU who advised me to not use folder.jpg
You expressed concern messing with your clients'
desktop.ini files and changing their systems. My impression of your use case is that you're working on a client's machine and you have been using 'folder.jpg' to easily spot their folders and improve your workflow.
My assumption was that your goals are:
1) Minimally modify the client's system.
2) Easily identify folders that you are working with.
3) Avoid conflicts with the client's configuraiton.
4) Have a solution that is portable across machines.
And that you cannot really achieve #4 given that all current folder thumbnail solutions require files in the folder. The folders themselves are portable, but having say 'MyFolder' on every machine show the custom thumb requires customizing the folder on every machine (which I would say is a non-portable solution). As PeterH said, generally portable means not changing the host machine.
My point was that using 'folder.jpg' is still changing their systems. What I was trying to express is that neither the 'folder.jpg' nor the '
desktop.ini' approach are particularly good solutions at meeting those goals.
They clearly satisfy #2. Partially satisfy #1, but an ideal solution would require zero changes. No guarantee on #3 but thus far you apparently haven't had issue using 'folder.jpg'. And as described above XY's offerings cannot satisfy #4.
Stef123 wrote:TheQwerty wrote:[ It works well for thumbnails stored within the folder, but just wasn't designed to be portable or entirely XY contained.
Doesn't this contradict what you said earlier?
Why would folder.jpg be less portable than
desktop.ini with its hard-wired path and drive letter?
My point was that I don't consider either to be portable solutions.
Stef123 wrote:I think we're having a communication problem. I don't understand how to use CFI as an alternative to folder.jpg. It seems different from custom folder thumbnails altogether?
Given the above goals it meets all 4.
#1 - The customization is done entirely in XY so nothing on the client's machine needs modified.
#2 - A custom icon should 'pop' just as much as a custom thumb.
#3 - Since it's entirely within XY there's no possibility of conflict.
#4 - It goes whereever your XY config goes.
Since it seems my assumptions of your goals is wrong - may I suggest you outline what it is you're trying to accompilsh and doing (pre-
desktop.ini) in a new thread?
Then if I think it's still possible to achieve with CFI instead of custom thumbs I'll explain how.