Text Editors

What other productivity software are you working with...
bdeshi
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12 Mar 2014 17:27
Location: Asteroid B-612 / Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by bdeshi »

Hmm, didn't think of that. :whistle:
BTW, no wonder Atom's huge. It apparently comes with a whole web-browser, not the "send-recieve packets and be done with it" type either.
Meanwhile I found answers to both of my questions, postponing the post could have saved me from tux.. :lol:
1. found a search-replace plugin with the scripts plugin, more useful than default, attached ctrl+f shortcut to it.
2. portablefreeware.com has directions to stop those reg-writes. (I don't know why I didn't look there first. It's one of my goto places for portable apps.)
Some plugins seem to use the registry anyways. I'll probably make a portable wrapper with PApps or something.
Icon Names | Onyx | Undocumented Commands | xypcre
[ this user is asleep ]

tux.

Re: Text Editors

Post by tux. »

SammaySarkar wrote:Meanwhile I found answers to both of my questions, postponing the post could have saved me from tux.. :lol:
You can't escape! :twisted:

FluxTorpedoe
Posts: 855
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 13:15

Re: Text Editors

Post by FluxTorpedoe »

@SammaySarkar
Hi'
Though I'm quite late here, I wanted to stress again the quality of Akelpad as the lightest (nearly-)full-featured editor I've found — on a slow machine it starts up nearly as fast as Notepad.
(I just updated my XYS syntax highlighting and auto-complete for it here.)

I'd noticed the registry misbehavior too… A bit reluctant about wrapping it up in a PAF though (for start-up speed reasons).

Regarding the search, I juggle between the very practical search panel (mapped it to ALT+F3) and the standard search.
Now that this one's regex engine is greedy too by default (like the search plug-in), what feature is it missing that you find in the plug-in?

bdeshi
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12 Mar 2014 17:27
Location: Asteroid B-612 / Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by bdeshi »

built-in search doesn't have "find all"/"replace all" buttons.
edit: I use a search vbscript that (probably) came with the Scripts plugin.
Icon Names | Onyx | Undocumented Commands | xypcre
[ this user is asleep ]

tux.

Re: Text Editors

Post by tux. »

Emacs works without buttons!

bdeshi
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12 Mar 2014 17:27
Location: Asteroid B-612 / Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by bdeshi »

tux. wrote:Emacs works without buttons!
It's quite difficult to work with when it lisps so much, you know!
Had to consult a psychotherapist the lst time I looked at emacs. :P
Icon Names | Onyx | Undocumented Commands | xypcre
[ this user is asleep ]

tux.

Re: Text Editors

Post by tux. »

Could it help you?

bdeshi
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12 Mar 2014 17:27
Location: Asteroid B-612 / Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by bdeshi »

nope. It kept indirectly directing me in the same directions.
Icon Names | Onyx | Undocumented Commands | xypcre
[ this user is asleep ]

tux.

Re: Text Editors

Post by tux. »

At least it did a thing!

FluxTorpedoe
Posts: 855
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 13:15

Re: Text Editors

Post by FluxTorpedoe »

SammaySarkar wrote:built-in search doesn't have "find all"/"replace all" buttons.
Wow, nice one this "find all"! I don't know how I missed it... Plus, the search script also has regex snippets management... (However, I don't see a difference between the search script "replace all" and the built-in one?)
BTW, one thing I miss in Akelpad is a general snippets tool (but I may have missed it too).

bdeshi
Posts: 4249
Joined: 12 Mar 2014 17:27
Location: Asteroid B-612 / Dhaka
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by bdeshi »

FluxTorpedoe wrote:However, I don't see a difference between the search script "replace all" and the built-in one?
Sorry, it's just that I think of find all/replace all as a completementing set. :kidding:
Icon Names | Onyx | Undocumented Commands | xypcre
[ this user is asleep ]

FluxTorpedoe
Posts: 855
Joined: 05 Oct 2011 13:15

Re: Text Editors

Post by FluxTorpedoe »

Oh, ok. ;)

In case that might be usefull to someone (and so this post isn't too sterile): I find AkelPad's status bar editing quite useful, e.g. to display the ascii code of the character under caret.
(my line in Akelpad.ini [Options] is: StatusUserFormat=Lines Selected: %ls %[110] Ascii(%cl) = %cd )

prino
Posts: 337
Joined: 18 Mar 2012 21:14
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by prino »

The z/OS ISPF editor. :mrgreen:
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins @ the.17+Gb.Google thingy
At last, a tiny bit of programming here... :mrgreen:

PeterH
Posts: 2785
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 20:39
Location: Germany

Re: Text Editors

Post by PeterH »

prino wrote:The z/OS ISPF editor. :mrgreen:
Hey, that's not fair. :evil:

But as you reminded me of ISPF Edit, I remembered I once had looked at some PC emulation... :D
...but it was the (still) commercial SPFPC, and just for playing around I didn't want to pay money. :roll:

But now I searched and found there are 2 free versions: Hybrid Editor XE and SPF Lite.
Anybody knows them and has a tip which one to prefer for a test?
Win11 Pro 223H2 Gerrman

prino
Posts: 337
Joined: 18 Mar 2012 21:14
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Contact:

Re: Text Editors

Post by prino »

PeterH wrote:
prino wrote:The z/OS ISPF editor. :mrgreen:
Hey, that's not fair. :evil:

But as you reminded me of ISPF Edit, I remembered I once had looked at some PC emulation... :D
...but it was the (still) commercial SPFPC, and just for playing around I didn't want to pay money. :roll:

But now I searched and found there are 2 free versions: Hybrid Editor XE and SPF Lite.
Anybody knows them and has a tip which one to prefer for a test?
Emulation? I use the real one on my PC, running z/OS 1.10 under Hercules and on an 8-core 3.6GHz AMD with 16GB it runs pretty well!

Have used SPF Lite, but the lack of REXX as a macro language in that one makes it useless.
Last edited by prino on 21 Sep 2014 18:10, edited 1 time in total.
Robert AH Prins
robert.ah.prins @ the.17+Gb.Google thingy
At last, a tiny bit of programming here... :mrgreen:

Post Reply