Image Editing
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 60602
- Joined: 22 May 2004 16:48
- Location: Win8.1 @100%, Win10 @100%
- Contact:
Image Editing
Up to now I used "Adobe Photoshop", but I want to keep my new system free from any Adobe products. Any suggestions (it should be able to import PSD files including layers)?
FAQ | XY News RSS | XY Twitter
Re: Image Editing
Sure,
from Germany, also coding maniacs: PhotoLine*.
Though the looks might be dated, the functional power is real - especially the non-destructive aspects are way beyond Adobe.
Cheers,
Filehero
*: Don't let yourself get confused by the clunky web site appearance.
from Germany, also coding maniacs: PhotoLine*.
Though the looks might be dated, the functional power is real - especially the non-destructive aspects are way beyond Adobe.
Cheers,
Filehero
*: Don't let yourself get confused by the clunky web site appearance.
-
- XY Blog Master
- Posts: 5824
- Joined: 02 Jan 2006 19:34
- Location: So. Chatham MA/Clearwater FL
- Contact:
Re: Image Editing
I think GIMP is the one that I've heard most often given on various places like http://alternativeto.net/software/adobe-photoshop/ but I have no actual exp with it as my ole basic Adobe Photoshop Elements that came with scanner years ago is enough for me...
Still spending WAY TOO much time here! But it's such a pleasure helping XY be a treasure!
(XP on laptop with touchpad and thus NO mouse!) Using latest beta vers when possible.
(XP on laptop with touchpad and thus NO mouse!) Using latest beta vers when possible.
Re: Image Editing
I want XY to serve soft ice cream. Please Don, make XY serve soft ice cream.
Re: Image Editing
+1 for PhotoLine (you should read the tutorials first) with a random fallback to Paint.NET where it's applicable. GIMP is mighty but has a weird handling (a bit like Photoshop on a Mac ).
I used to use PaintShop Pro for years, but Corel ruined it.
I used to use PaintShop Pro for years, but Corel ruined it.
Re: Image Editing
Oh, did they ever.tux. wrote:I used to use PaintShop Pro for years, but Corel ruined it.
Yes, Photoline is quite good.
I want XY to serve soft ice cream. Please Don, make XY serve soft ice cream.
Re: Image Editing
Yep. Their next death candidate: Bibble.Nighted wrote:Oh, did they ever.
-
- Posts: 855
- Joined: 05 Oct 2011 13:15
Re: Image Editing
Hi'
Acknowledging the fact that:
- there's no real replacement to Photoshop production-wise — but that whateverelse-wise (price, flexibility, customer-friendliness...), it's a huge letdown,
- accordingly, shifting one's expectations
I second trying:
- Gimp (the closest alternative)
- Photoline
I suggest trying:
- PhotoFiltre Studio (there's a free v7 and a 30€ v10)
- Photoscape (free — more user-friendliness, less production-friendliness)
Regarding artweaver, it's a really interesting alternative too — but to Painter more than Photoshop, more if you're into illustration (i.e. you draw and use a graphic tablet).
In any case, to supplement the use of Photoshop (or any alternative), (plus, depending on one's needs, the use of an image management tool, e.g. Lightroom, Picasa...) I strongly recommend a generic manipulation tool for everyday needs:
- Faststone Viewer (free — quite powerful and very efficient, but no compositing). People underestimate how much (and fast) can be done with a tool like this.
- or of course, one of the usual alternatives (that may be a bit more powerful but IMHO a bit less efficient): XnView, IrfanView, ACDsee
Acknowledging the fact that:
- there's no real replacement to Photoshop production-wise — but that whateverelse-wise (price, flexibility, customer-friendliness...), it's a huge letdown,
- accordingly, shifting one's expectations
I second trying:
- Gimp (the closest alternative)
- Photoline
I suggest trying:
- PhotoFiltre Studio (there's a free v7 and a 30€ v10)
- Photoscape (free — more user-friendliness, less production-friendliness)
Regarding artweaver, it's a really interesting alternative too — but to Painter more than Photoshop, more if you're into illustration (i.e. you draw and use a graphic tablet).
In any case, to supplement the use of Photoshop (or any alternative), (plus, depending on one's needs, the use of an image management tool, e.g. Lightroom, Picasa...) I strongly recommend a generic manipulation tool for everyday needs:
- Faststone Viewer (free — quite powerful and very efficient, but no compositing). People underestimate how much (and fast) can be done with a tool like this.
- or of course, one of the usual alternatives (that may be a bit more powerful but IMHO a bit less efficient): XnView, IrfanView, ACDsee
• Scripts: Session Manager | SlideShow | Collection Manager | Power Launcher | Akelpad syntax highlighting | ...
Re: Image Editing
The GIMP can replace Photoshop AFAIK. Still I don't like its "usability" (or the lack thereof).FluxTorpedoe wrote:- there's no real replacement to Photoshop production-wise — but that whateverelse-wise (price, flexibility, customer-friendliness...), it's a huge letdown,
- accordingly, shifting one's expectations
-
- Posts: 855
- Joined: 05 Oct 2011 13:15
Re: Image Editing
Pretty much what I meant!tux. wrote:The GIMP can replace Photoshop AFAIK. Still I don't like its "usability" (or the lack thereof).
When you need to do complicated things really fast in a production work-flow, PS managed to keep its edge over the years somehow (one of the few softs that really did)...
But apart from this case-scenario, it doesn't justify its slowwwww pace of improvement (they would have Don commited right away! ), specially compared to its high upgrade/price-tag.
And especially compared to The Gimp...
• Scripts: Session Manager | SlideShow | Collection Manager | Power Launcher | Akelpad syntax highlighting | ...
Re: Image Editing
(it should be able to import PSD files including layers)?
If my memory serves me, the Gimp doesn't handle layers from PSD files very well. But it's easy to check.The GIMP can replace Photoshop AFAIK.
http://portableapps.com/apps/graphics_p ... p_portable
Kind regards
Regmos
Regmos
Re: Image Editing
Another one: afaik Gimp still does not offer full support for 16bit color depth. Not that I think everybody will need it (it's rather an issue for some photographers), but it's one of those features "pipelined" for many, many years now.Regmos wrote:If my memory serves me, the Gimp doesn't handle layers from PSD files very well. But it's easy to check.The GIMP can replace Photoshop AFAIK.
Cheers,
Filehero
Re: Image Editing
Already fixed in GIMP 2.9/2.10.Filehero wrote:Another one: afaik Gimp still does not offer full support for 16bit color depth.