XYplorer Beta Club

Patience may be good, but the 64 bit version has been listed as 'planned' since 2012.

Fast Explorer looks like it was done for 32 bit windows, had problem with everything that was 32 bit on a 64 bit system, which is the problem I'm having. I did find what looked like plausible registry settings, but no dice. Ultraedit seems to be unusual in that it puts content menu item under the cu...

Ran into the referenced problem, but with Ultraedit I found a 32bit version of what looks like the correct file (ue32ctmn.dll), but running regsvr32 with that file got an error message to the effect that the dll was loaded, but the entry point DllRegisterServer was not found, and nothing was done. L...

Very nice!

Is that documented somewhere and/or what's its called? I did figure out that in the .ini file its disty.

And it does seem that XP goes denser than W7, although perhaps its due to running W7 under vmware, although the resolution is supposed to be the same.

One of the reasons I'm trying xyplorer is because Windows Explorer in Windows 7 has expanded the line spacing, with the result that one gets about 20% fewer listings in a given amount of screen space. I found that xyplorer on 7 has a different font than XP, but even after I change the font to match ...

I'm running Windows Server 2003, all updates.

V9.9 of xplorer

background processing is not enabled.

I tried a single file, same result. Interesting enough I did this after a full extract that had the problem, and got message about replacing existing file 0 bytes long with other file 0 bytes long.

I use UltraISO for extracting large .iso's because unlike winrar or winzip it creates the extracted files directly in the destination folder rather than creating them in the temp folder and then moving them over. I've been doing this with Windows Explorer for years, no problems. The last few days I'...