XYplorer Beta Club

I connected my camera to the PC. Learned that it's a "portable device"... There are some restrictions. OK. But especially: copy to PC is possible, but for pictures backup would be rather neccessary, especially *not* to change any dates . And, as it seems, there's almost no scripting: scrip...

Strange. You also tested with fresh?

But it's not high prio - so no problem to stop it...

Thanks for looking,
and for fixing the root-property problem!

Peter H

First: your fix is fine: properties of c: look OK - no scrambling any more :tup: But: your last info didn't help! E.g. can't find out how to control current item, and how to interpret status (bar) display. In general in status I see the name of the folder I've selected, but *sometimes* there's "...

OK, I'll try better: "hardcopy"=screencopy: create the attached pictures "properties": as mentioned in the very first post: a script, (named prop#), looping $i from 1 to 333, and for each executing $prop = Property("#$i n"); then skipping each "" return print ...

OK: I'll try Sequence as before, from XY start, *all* actions in pane1 start | select c: | call properties | doubleclick c: | select Users | properties hardcopy: t1.jpg doubleclick Users | select Peter | properties Mousebutton back (to c:) | select Users | properties hardcopy t2.jpg Is it what you w...

No - as long as I'm navigating just 1 up/down I usually do (and did it here) in pane!
Just tried it in tree - and the 1st level problem doesn't appear!

Didn't expect something like that. (And it seems vice versa.)

Edit -- happens on fresh, too -- /Edit Just tested: - new start XY - select c: - test properties: garbled - double click c:, select Users - test properties: no reply for any number !!! - repeat both (0 to any times) no change - double click users, sel your userid - properties: all corrrect - back to...

Oh - I didn't expect it doesn't, and found it strange, i.e. a bug. And I didn't expect you know it's so. And sometimes it doesn't support first-level folders. (Maybe, if you directly first try a drive, then that folder?) When I have some time I'll test to see if there's a pattern... Have a fine (and...

Hi there - I'm back after quite a long timeout... ...and starting with a bug. That's me. :whistle: OK: working with the property() function for some objects. That is: selecting some object in pane1, then executing $prop = Property("#$i n"); for $i = 1 to 333, dropping each empty result, an...

Jetzt riechen die Käfer nach Kaffee

Edit: Hoffentlich fällt keiner rein...

c0thirty said: They're a weird grey area between symlinks and hard links and I'm not sure exactly what safety if any they offer over hard links.

I'd say you can't / shouldn't compare these, as hardlinks are different usage as symlinks.

I think so. Will go to verify.

You know that hardlinks *must* refer to the same disk partition they are in?

Don often said he doesn't like too much smartness.
For this situation the new logic seems to be negative
- though the general idea seemed to be fine.

Maybe it needs a bit polish, eg when the prev name is truncated, as described.

It seems you mean maximum, not minimum?