The new behavior requires very fine manipulation for short name items
Close the old behavior of the entire line selection is better for me
Search found 115 matches
- 19 Feb 2025 05:24
- Forum: Wishes
- Topic: Add option to restore the old behavior of the "Name column distinguishes between"
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2791
- 13 Feb 2025 21:56
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3831
Re: When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
1. Open "This PC" in the tab
2. In the path bar, input "<xypath>\..\" and press Enter
Maybe it would be better to record a video?
https://gofile.io/d/LMeLt3
2. In the path bar, input "<xypath>\..\" and press Enter
Maybe it would be better to record a video?
https://gofile.io/d/LMeLt3
- 13 Feb 2025 20:41
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3831
Re: When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
The dialog box display location does not exist
This is when using the default configuration
This is when using the default configuration
- 13 Feb 2025 03:42
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3831
When the path is located at "This PC", "<xypath>\..\" does not work
Works normally when located inside any drive
- 25 Oct 2024 14:15
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
System / Thread Locale ID: 2052 (zh-CN) / 2052 (zh-CN) Default ANSI Code Page: 936 (ANSI/OEM - 简体中文 GBK) Active ANSI Code Page: 936 (ANSI/OEM - 简体中文 GBK) Default OEM code page: 936 (ANSI/OEM - 简体中文 GBK) Active OEM Code Page: 936 (ANSI/OEM - 简体中文 GBK) DBCS Code Page: Yes Main Contents Font: 微软雅黑 9 B...
- 25 Oct 2024 12:38
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
It cannot be closed by normal methods in the Chinese language system. Killing the process will automatically restart immediately.
It will not become faster after closing using a special method (Image File Execution Options)
Perhaps it is necessary to test with the Chinese system in a virtual machine?
It will not become faster after closing using a special method (Image File Execution Options)
Perhaps it is necessary to test with the Chinese system in a virtual machine?
- 24 Oct 2024 22:59
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
1) windows 10 21h2 19044.2006
2) Using Segoe UI is also slow
I noticed when Line numbers relative font size is less than 100
The CPU usage of the ChsIME.exe process for Chinese input method is very high.
I suspect this is related to performance lag
2) Using Segoe UI is also slow
I noticed when Line numbers relative font size is less than 100
The CPU usage of the ChsIME.exe process for Chinese input method is very high.
I suspect this is related to performance lag
- 24 Oct 2024 22:35
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
1) font size: 9
2) v26.50.0201 Still very slow
2) v26.50.0201 Still very slow
- 24 Oct 2024 21:20
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
Microsoft YaHei
- 24 Oct 2024 19:46
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
The previous value was 90
There is a difference in size between 90 and 100
There is a difference in size between 90 and 100
- 24 Oct 2024 18:53
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
I found the reason. Same problem as this one
viewtopic.php?t=28000
Modify Line numbers relative font size to 100 and the performance returns to normal
viewtopic.php?t=28000
Modify Line numbers relative font size to 100 and the performance returns to normal
- 24 Oct 2024 18:35
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
1) Deleting the column on the far right has no effect
2) Turning off the color filter has no effect
2) Turning off the color filter has no effect
- 24 Oct 2024 18:25
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
- 24 Oct 2024 18:17
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Re: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
1. Hold down the left mouse button to select multiple files and quickly move the selection box away from the files. Perform the action quickly repeatedly without releasing the left mouse button 2. When there is a horizontal scrollbar, hold down the left mouse button and quickly move the mouse left a...
- 24 Oct 2024 15:29
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
- Replies: 21
- Views: 1712
Performance lag starting from 26.40.0300
The versions 26.40.0300 and later have noticeable performance lag.
When rolling back to 26.40.0200, performance returned to normal.
Test with default configuration still reproduces
This is the recorded comparison video
gofile.io/d/FBTahA
When rolling back to 26.40.0200, performance returned to normal.
Test with default configuration still reproduces
This is the recorded comparison video
gofile.io/d/FBTahA